<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Popular Topics]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that are sorted by post count]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/popular/alltime</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:10:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/popular/alltime.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:21:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[NUT package (2.8.0 and below)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Beginning with 2.8.1, I am transitioning NUT support to a new thread, which can be found here.
Please continue to post issues related to 2.8.0_2 and below to this thread.
Also, I am actively seeking people to test the new 2.8.1 pfSense NUT package prior to general release. I would appreciate any help you can offer. Thanks!
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/102959/nut-package-2-8-0-and-below</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/102959/nut-package-2-8-0-and-below</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dennypage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:21:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unofficial E2guardian package for pfSense]]></title><description><![CDATA[@periko said in Unofficial E2guardian package for pfSense:

Hello marcelloc or other e2guardian users, does e2guardian is already support for pfsense 2.5.2?
Regards!!!

I've been using it on 2.5.2 for months now, no issues.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/113757/unofficial-e2guardian-package-for-pfsense</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/113757/unofficial-e2guardian-package-for-pfsense</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pfsensation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:01:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PfBlockerNG]]></title><description><![CDATA[@breeoge said in PfBlockerNG:

@belt9:

I wanted to chime in here as I just updated from a month old RC to 2.4.0-RELEASE last night and ran into this problem today.
I haven't read through all of the many pages of the many threads that seem related to this issue (show how popular pfBNG is!), so maybe this has already been covered.
But I've seen several people state that this doesn't happen on ZFS - I have a raidz2 ZFS install, and this happened to me, just throwing that out there.

That is good to know. Thank you for the report.  BBcan177 is currently updating it to use SQLlite and this should fix any issues in the future.  In the other thread there is a temp fix posted..
https://create.vista.com/colors/palettes/
Thank you
BreeOge

Hello my friend. Many thanks to Bbcan177 for keeping the report up to date. as a result of this, in principle, the given problems are corrected.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/77601/pfblockerng</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/77601/pfblockerng</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KennethMauriello777]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 17:05:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watchguard XTM 5 Series]]></title><description><![CDATA[Ha, that would do it!
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39639/watchguard-xtm-5-series</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39639/watchguard-xtm-5-series</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:57:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playing with fq_codel in 2.4]]></title><description><![CDATA[@robnitro That sounds really good.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/112527/playing-with-fq_codel-in-2-4</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/112527/playing-with-fq_codel-in-2-4</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeny001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 22:49:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PfBlockerNG v2.0 w&#x2F;DNSBL]]></title><description><![CDATA[@ck42 The entry is related to Firewall / pfBlockerNG/  DNSBL / DNSBL Category Blacklist.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/91736/pfblockerng-v2-0-w-dnsbl</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/91736/pfblockerng-v2-0-w-dnsbl</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[RonpfS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:50:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pacote não oficial E2guardian v5 para software pfsense®]]></title><description><![CDATA[@gersonalves obrigado pelo retorno, já verifiquei se há conflito de porta por algum outro serviço, mas não há, inclusive quando para a navegação eu sempre vejo o netstat -an | grep -i listen e sempre a porta *.8081(ssl) deixa de listar, a porta 8080 continua listando, daí eu salvo a conf do e2guardian em seguida a porta 8081 começa a listar novamente e a navegação volta a fluir normalmente.
tcp4       0      0 *.8081                 .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 127.0.0.1.8080         .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 192.168.0.254.8080     .                    LISTEN
tcp6       0      0 *.53                   .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 *.53                   .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 *.10050                .                    LISTEN
tcp6       0      0 *.80                   .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 *.80                   .                    LISTEN
tcp6       0      0 *.xxxx                .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 *.xxxx                .                    LISTEN
tcp4       0      0 *.xxxx                .                    LISTEN
tcp6       0      0 *.xxxx                .                    LISTEN
Já verifiquei no firewall e nat e não há algum impedimento com as portas de escuta do e2guardian.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/128007/pacote-não-oficial-e2guardian-v5-para-software-pfsense</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/128007/pacote-não-oficial-e2guardian-v5-para-software-pfsense</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kaiomg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 21:50:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PfBlocker]]></title><description><![CDATA[There is now a pfBlockerNG package that replaces pfBlocker, so I am locking this thread.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/38700/pfblocker</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/38700/pfblocker</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jdillard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:08:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Postfix - antispam and relay package]]></title><description><![CDATA[@winsonfa
It should still work?
Those errors are just cosmetic, you can ignore.
On my machine, it gives that error but still works.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/36972/postfix-antispam-and-relay-package</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/36972/postfix-antispam-and-relay-package</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bismarck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:57:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watchguard Firebox M400&#x2F;M500]]></title><description><![CDATA[The i7 still commands an unrealistic premium IMO. The i5s are far cheaper and easier to get and still easily powerful enough for most. I'm running an i5-4670S in one without issue. Pulls ~24W.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/124734/watchguard-firebox-m400-m500</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/124734/watchguard-firebox-m400-m500</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:16:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is the biggest attack in GBPS you stopped]]></title><description><![CDATA[This topic is now locked.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/82345/what-is-the-biggest-attack-in-gbps-you-stopped</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/82345/what-is-the-biggest-attack-in-gbps-you-stopped</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jwt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2015 08:09:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PC Engines apu2 experiences]]></title><description><![CDATA[So we've snuck past the 10 year anniversary of the APU2 
Have recently updated my APU2 to pfSense Plus 26.03 - absolutely worth the effort just for these fixes alone:

Fixed: GUI performance degradation due to check for weak passwords on each page load (speeds up the UI considerably on the venerable AMD GX-412TC)
Added: Update the SSH server configuration to current standards and include post-quantum cryptography algorithms
Added: Auto-renewal for certificates

Kudos to Netgate, PC Engines &amp; 3mdeb for providing such a robust &amp; performant gateway.
Lastly I'm still running the same tweaks as previously documented (see https://forum.netgate.com/post/1222684 above)
Enjoy 
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/95148/pc-engines-apu2-experiences</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/95148/pc-engines-apu2-experiences</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dugeem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:36:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Country Block]]></title><description><![CDATA[I'll look into this. At the moment the Country data is static on Country IP Block. Country IP Ranges don't change enough to cause this app to pull dynamic data. There are times when the country data is updated but that's only about every 6 months.
In the mean time focus has moved from Country Block to pfBlocker, FYI.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/24133/country-block</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/24133/country-block</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tommyboy180]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:55:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Successful Install on Watchguard Firebox X700!]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi guys, I know this is a super old thread - but just wondering if anyone in here could share me the a copy of the last x32 bit via DD configured for the x700 - Please see here for the actual thread with the background as to why: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/133044/pfsense-image-for-firebox-x700
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/7024/successful-install-on-watchguard-firebox-x700</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/7024/successful-install-on-watchguard-firebox-x700</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:30:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Packages wishlist?]]></title><description><![CDATA[PRTG
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/7/packages-wishlist</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/7/packages-wishlist</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OpIT GmbH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:59:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NEW Package: freeRADIUS 2.x]]></title><description><![CDATA[You should most likely create a new thread if you feel you have found a bug, and if can duplicate it then please open a redmine on it.  Locking this thread since it is 7 years old.
And freerad 2.x is no longer a new package anyway.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39727/new-package-freeradius-2-x</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39727/new-package-freeradius-2-x</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnpoz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:37:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Squid 3.3.10 para pfsense 2.0 e 2.1 com filtro de SSL&#x2F;HTTPS]]></title><description><![CDATA[If you change pFSense / Services / Squid Proxy Server / GEneral tab Then check the SSL Man In The Middle Filtering area and change the SSL/MITM Mode from Splice WhiteList, Bumb OtherWise to the Splice ALL
the problem can be solve with a this shape.
OR
With a default value of the SSL/MITM Mode with Splice WhiteList, Bumb OtherWise you can goto ACLs atb and add desıred web site url to the WhiteList area ie: online.kktcmaliye.com
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/56272/squid-3-3-10-para-pfsense-2-0-e-2-1-com-filtro-de-ssl-https</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/56272/squid-3-3-10-para-pfsense-2-0-e-2-1-com-filtro-de-ssl-https</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kazimates]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[LCDProc 0.5.4-dev]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hello Stephenw10
Thanks much for the message. I will check it, although the service can't start, not with that config.
Anyway, I am also trying to use parallel port configuration since it doesnt' need any interface in between. (I have another display hd44780 compatible with no USB interface)
Will post the results here after all.
Thanks
Fabricio.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/40052/lcdproc-0-5-4-dev</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/40052/lcdproc-0-5-4-dev</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fabricioguzzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:54:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ATT Uverse RG Bypass (0.2 BTC)]]></title><description><![CDATA[@jasonsansone I haven't tested the new pf versions yet. Will be starting my migration project in the next few weeks.
The details are fairly self explanatory I thought. Basically openssl disables certain weaker ciphers.  The config file re-enables them for the wpa_supplicant session. Depending on which wpa_supplicant is in use, this is either done simply through the wpa_supplicant.conf file (example at the end of the file), or through a config file for openssl that's referenced in the command line launching wpa_supplicant.
@dreamdenizen Mac for wpa_supplicant doesn't have to be that of RG, or even RG where certs came from. What matters is the mac in wpa_supplicant.conf file match that of the wan interface mac requesting dhcp.  Otherwise, you'll get eapol authentication, but never received an IP because of the mismatch.
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/99190/att-uverse-rg-bypass-0-2-btc</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/99190/att-uverse-rg-bypass-0-2-btc</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[GPz1100]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:30:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taming the beasts… aka suricata blueprint]]></title><description><![CDATA[@shred yup, I've been there, I also got confuse about that. but that rule is to block other interface to access management port. some of the link or pictures of this guide did not retrieve when netgate upgrade their forum.
[image: 1565052185679-02268e4d-4c47-4b6c-b5ed-0cdbe7ee2a20-image.png]
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70170/taming-the-beasts-aka-suricata-blueprint</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/70170/taming-the-beasts-aka-suricata-blueprint</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jasonraymundo31]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:50:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>