<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Provision fibre and pfsense router.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Working with the provider/carrier to provision fibre to building (upgrade from ADSL, yay!) and the initial question (before deployment) they've asked is "Can you confirm if a /31 will be compatible with your equipment for IP addressing?"</p>
<p dir="auto">We're using the SG-4860.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/100389/provision-fibre-and-pfsense-router</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 02:15:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/100389.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 22:27:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Provision fibre and pfsense router. on Wed, 25 May 2016 14:02:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pfdigs">@<bdi>pfdigs</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Working with the provider/carrier to provision fibre to building (upgrade from ADSL, yay!) and the initial question (before deployment) they've asked is "Can you confirm if a /31 will be compatible with your equipment for IP addressing?"</p>
<p dir="auto">We're using the SG-4860.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Yes that would be fine.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/627220</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/627220</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[elementalwindx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 14:02:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>