<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bhyve package $100USD]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I need a bhyve package for pfSense 2.3.2+. For now, I'll commit $100USD to this goal.</p>
<p dir="auto">Specifications for now(above price):<br />
Single Instance/vm for FreeBSD 10x<br />
Follows best practices as much as possible. (pfSense/Bhyve)</p>
<p dir="auto">I need to search and update this, but I believe it was mentioned by the pfSense team that they use /might integrate vm-bhyve into future versions (https://github.com/churchers/vm-bhyve). I'd think this would be the best approach to gaining support of pfSense of having this adopted.</p>
<p dir="auto">I know next to nothing about bhyve, I don't know if the price is fair for what I'm asking. I need this fairly quick, as I've been bit by a failure that this could have prevented, and wish not to be bit by it again.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/105832/bhyve-package-100usd</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:42:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/105832.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2016 23:52:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>