<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Pfsense setup]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi guys,</p>
<p dir="auto">I need help. What I'm trying to do in my pfsense setup. I want to test/implement captive portal using pfsense, I have a modem/DSL connect to the switch 2960 catalyst then connect with my PC and physical router which is my pfsense. Is it good setup for testing?</p>
<p dir="auto">**Or I need to add 1 more router for pfsense?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/107955/pfsense-setup</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:26:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/107955.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:41:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Pfsense setup on Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:50:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">What if I use virtualbox for pfsense instead installing physical pfsense router?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This might be not the problem as I see it right but, then you will need a second NIC or you must<br />
working with other things such VLANs.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Do I need to add or buy 1 NIC for pfsense, right?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">It is not a must be but the best in my eyes would be to have one WAN and one LAN interface.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">BTW. Can I apply router on a stick in cisco 2960 for pfsense?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Definitely not able to realize as I am informed!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/662229</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/662229</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:50:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Pfsense setup on Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:50:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In normal I personally would suggest you to change that chain of devices to that order:<br />
Internet –- ISP --- Modem --- pfSense --- Switch --- PC, WLAN APs and other devices each in his own VLAN.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Is it okay I use virtualbox or physical pfsense router?</p>
<p dir="auto">BTW. Can I apply router on a stick in cisco 2960 for pfsense?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/661740</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/661740</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[watabigeye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:50:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Pfsense setup on Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:38:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hope you don't mind me asking..</p>
<p dir="auto">How does the APU2C4 compare to the Qotom J1900 ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
<p dir="auto">Woops sorry replied to wrong thread</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/661634</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/661634</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TomT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:38:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Pfsense setup on Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:22:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@BlueKobold:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In normal I personally would suggest you to change that chain of devices to that order:<br />
Internet –- ISP --- Modem --- pfSense --- Switch --- PC, WLAN APs and other devices each in his own VLAN.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you want to use the Captive Portal for guests only you might be better of going to create<br />
two VLANs (tagged) from the pfSense through the Switch to the or a external WLAN AP that<br />
is offering then one WLAN (internal) for you and one WLAN (external) for guests. If the<br />
Switch is supporting VLANs and the WLAN AP is an external device this should be no<br />
problem for you to realize it in that way. If the WLAN AP is internal, I mean a miniPCI(e)<br />
card that is installed inside of the pfSense firewall you could set up there then two VLANs<br />
directly connected to that WiFI card interfaces and you don´t need the switch for this.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thanks BlueKobold,<br />
What if I use virtualbox for pfsense instead installing physical pfsense router?<br />
Do I need to add or buy 1 NIC for pfsense, right?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/661623</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/661623</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[watabigeye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:22:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Pfsense setup on Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:21:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">In normal I personally would suggest you to change that chain of devices to that order:<br />
Internet –- ISP --- Modem --- pfSense --- Switch --- PC, WLAN APs and other devices each in his own VLAN.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you want to use the Captive Portal for guests only you might be better of going to create<br />
two VLANs (tagged) from the pfSense through the Switch to the or a external WLAN AP that<br />
is offering then one WLAN (internal) for you and one WLAN (external) for guests. If the<br />
Switch is supporting VLANs and the WLAN AP is an external device this should be no<br />
problem for you to realize it in that way. If the WLAN AP is internal, I mean a miniPCI(e)<br />
card that is installed inside of the pfSense firewall you could set up there then two VLANs<br />
directly connected to that WiFI card interfaces and you don´t need the switch for this.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/661447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/661447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:21:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>