<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">should I use virtual IP as a replacement like Cisco loopback interface IP?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/111812/cisco-loopback-interface-replacement-on-pfsense</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 04:56:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/111812.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2017 06:12:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense? on Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:40:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jknott">@<bdi>JKnott</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">cisco loopback0 for GRE tunnel is useful since it act as logical interface and GRE tunnel source could use loopback0 interface IP. How could I do that on pfsense?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Any reason you can't use the standard 127.0.0.1 &amp; ::1 loopbacks?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">logical interface IP is different than localhost IP, you can't use 127.0.0.1 on GRE tunnel setting.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/682811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/682811</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lkthomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:40:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense? on Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:12:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">cisco loopback0 for GRE tunnel is useful since it act as logical interface and GRE tunnel source could use loopback0 interface IP. How could I do that on pfsense?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Any reason you can't use the standard 127.0.0.1 &amp; ::1 loopbacks?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/682418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/682418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JKnott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:12:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense? on Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:50:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You can add an IP alias VIP on Localhost to get a similar effect</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/682341</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/682341</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:50:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense? on Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:50:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">cisco loopback0 for GRE tunnel is useful since it act as logical interface and GRE tunnel source could use loopback0 interface IP. How could I do that on pfsense?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/681575</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/681575</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lkthomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:50:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco loopback interface replacement on pfSense? on Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:54:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">What exactly are you trying to accomplish?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/681153</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/681153</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:54:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>