<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hardware Sizing - 30+ VLANS]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can give me some advice, I have a customer with student accomodation, with 13 apartments. For this, I'm using an APU 1D board, each apartment has it's own VLAN, and an upload/download limit, that's it, nothing else majorly fancy. It works fine, and everything runs well.</p>
<p dir="auto">The same customer is looking at a 31 apartment building, the setup would be the same, seperate VLAN's, upload/download limit, nothing else fancy. Is this going to be too much for the APU 1D?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/113348/hardware-sizing-30-vlans</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:25:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/113348.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:35:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hardware Sizing - 30+ VLANS on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:23:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Is this going to be too much for the APU 1D?</p>
</blockquote>
<ul>
<li>APU2C4</li>
<li>Jetway NF9HG-2930 if this might be not really strong enough!</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">But the best way in my eyes is to insert a small Layer3 Switch such as the following<br />
A D-Link DGS-1510 or Cisco SG350, they will route between the VLANs if this is needed with wire speed<br />
if not needed you can also go with a Cisco SG220 switch, that is really fast and wicked. then the APU1D<br />
would be enough for it or one from the both other named above boxes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/688271</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/688271</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:23:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hardware Sizing - 30+ VLANS on Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:53:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It'll be the latest APU, can't keep up with the revisions :)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/688189</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/688189</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Computer Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:53:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hardware Sizing - 30+ VLANS on Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:04:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The number of VLANs doesn't really matter; the performance is going to depend on the number of packets (which is more or less constrained in this case by the internet bandwidth). FWIW, a new deployment is probably better off using an APU2, which is a bit cheaper, a bit faster, and should have a longer availability.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/688152</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/688152</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[VAMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:04:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>