<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PfSense SYSLOG messages not to spec]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">(I'm new to pfSense so this issue may have been around for a while, but it certainly happens on the 20080913 build…)</p>
<p dir="auto">I searched on these forums for a while, but found no reference to this:</p>
<p dir="auto">RFC 3164 ("The BSD Syslog Protocol") dictates that following the Timestamp field will be a space then the "HOSTNAME" which may be either the actual hostname or the device's IP address.  It looks like (at least in the 20080913 build) pfSense is not including a hostname of any kind in any of its messages.</p>
<p dir="auto">Is this something that could be addressed?  I imagine it would be trivial for someone familiar with the code to correct, but if it's deemed not of enough value, I'd be happy to jump in and see if I can get it done if the final patch is something that would be considered for the project.</p>
<p dir="auto">Comments?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/11456/pfsense-syslog-messages-not-to-spec</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:33:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/11456.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:48:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PfSense SYSLOG messages not to spec on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:32:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Cool - thanks for the info.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/183544</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/183544</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[berniem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:32:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PfSense SYSLOG messages not to spec on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:10:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This has always been the case, but you're right, it should be there. I opened a bug ticket, it's not a regression from 1.2 so it won't be fixed in 1.2.1 (only regressions are getting fixed there prior to its release), but will after that release.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/183542</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/183542</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:10:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>