<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Could I have better luck with PFS on KVM versus ESXi]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I got a tiny PC, a Zotac CI323: fanless, 2 ethernets, quadcore, AES-NI, stuck 16GB RAM and 200GB SSD, had big plans for a home VM lab and wanted to use PFS in a VM as well.  So I did that ISO image edit of VMware6 to include my required net drivers and esxi installed, PFS installed, things go great for a few weeks, then horribal intermittent packet loss, netflix buffering etc.</p>
<p dir="auto">so I put PFS native on it and its been flawless for months.  im sure this zotac isnt certified for ESX, so, whatever.</p>
<p dir="auto">also tried hyper-V, it boots the ISO but fails on tryin to run the installer.</p>
<p dir="auto">Im sure I can manage to get CentOS and KVM on there, but will I run into those packet losses again?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/115295/could-i-have-better-luck-with-pfs-on-kvm-versus-esxi</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 09:16:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/115295.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 22:51:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>