<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Unbound dns discovery]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@work we use a print-management service called papercut.</p>
<p dir="auto">they have this newish feature called 'mobility print', that allows byod printing easily by use of an app.</p>
<p dir="auto">There are 2 options to get this app working<br />
-mdns  (will probably work when using avahi to infect the network with zillions of multicasts)</p>
<p dir="auto">-dns discovery (never heard about it)</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">;–-------------- Mobility Print records --------------</p>
<p dir="auto">b._dns-sd._udp      IN PTR pc-printer-discovery<br />
lb._dns-sd._udp      IN PTR pc-printer-discovery<br />
pc-printer-discovery IN NS  print-server-host<br />
print-server-host    IN A  XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX</p>
<p dir="auto">;--------------- End of Mobility Print records ---------</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">so that would be a valid config when using a BIND zone (example from papercut docs)<br />
Anyone know how to translate the above in unbound?</p>
<p dir="auto">fyi captiveportal is involved.</p>
<p dir="auto">I know i could setup a separate VM with a bind or could probably do the same on one of the DC's, but would prefer to use the resolver builtin to pfsense</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/115516/unbound-dns-discovery</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 21:34:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/115516.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 09:06:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbound dns discovery on Tue, 26 Dec 2017 05:04:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">There was a huge thread about this papercut stuff.. I do not recall how it turned out… I had installed their software and looked at it but hen got side tracked.. What I recall is their software was borked from there to sunset...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/742744</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/742744</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnpoz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 05:04:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbound dns discovery on Mon, 25 Dec 2017 23:33:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I do have something similar setup using the BIND package, but this is also the only thing really preventing me from just running unbound (a.k.a "DNS Resolver") — which is better integrated with the system.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/731243</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/731243</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaos215bar2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 23:33:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unbound dns discovery on Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:17:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hey heper,</p>
<p dir="auto">did you manage to get this working?</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm having the same problem here:<br />
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=131223.0</p>
<p dir="auto">Regards</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/708842</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/708842</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[posto587]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:17:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>