<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi everyone,</p>
<p dir="auto">I got a HP T620 Plus Thin Client from office for free last week and was trying to turn it into my homelab router at home. I also bought a Intel PRO/1000 PT to be installed into the Thin Client. Now, installation and assigning WAN to the onboard Realtek nic went smoothly, but once I tried connecting any devices to any of the port on the Intel card, it never gets link-up. It shows all Intel ports as valid interfaces when I chose assign interfaces, but they are all "down" even when I plugged a device into any one of the ports.</p>
<p dir="auto">Has someone had similar issues with their Thin clients before and how to resolve this?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/117901/hp-t620-plus-thin-client-with-intel-pro-1000-pt-quad-issue</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:51:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/117901.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:14:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:48:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">When version 2.5 arrives, all the cheap Thin Clients that now are used for pfSense become totally useless,<br />
unless you keep version 2.3.4 using.<br />
Even the nice XTM5 boxes will be useless then.<br />
The Thin Clients that have a AES-NI supported cpu, are at least 2 or 3 times more expensive,<br />
at not so attractive anymore for the use of pfSense.</p>
<p dir="auto">Grtz<br />
DeLorean</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/711575</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/711575</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeLorean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:48:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:24:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gurnsee">@<bdi>Gurnsee</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">On a side note, I was surprised not many uses HP thin clients here. Is it because it's expensive and rather hard to get?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">1st: costs, for the cost of the new HP TC you can get a pretty decent pfsense platform (albeit usually in a bulkier case)<br />
2nd: not everyone even know that "thin client" means, even less understand what x86 TCs could be used for such unusual purpose.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/711556</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/711556</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Soyokaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:24:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:57:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gurnsee">@<bdi>Gurnsee</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">On a side note, I was surprised not many uses HP thin clients here. Is it because it's expensive and rather hard to get?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I have used many Fujitsu Futro S550 with CF card (embedded version) and Fujitsu Futro S900 and S900N with mSata SSD (full pfSense version),<br />
because these costs less then then HP T620 here in Belgium, and also these doesn't require a extra expansion bay like the T620 Plus, for adding a extra NIC card.<br />
This extra bay rises the total costs.<br />
With these Fujitsu Thin Clients a maximum throughput speed arround 550Mbps is possible.</p>
<p dir="auto">Grtz<br />
DeLorean</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/711407</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/711407</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeLorean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:57:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 21:15:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gurnsee">@<bdi>Gurnsee</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">On a side note, I was surprised not many uses HP thin clients here. Is it because it's expensive and rather hard to get?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Most likely. Those two are rarely a good combination to make a platform hugely successful anywhere and least of all to the users of this forum… ;)</p>
<p dir="auto">Seriously, the plus with a nic-card looks like a great low powered compact basic firewalling pfSense platform for internet connections below 500 Mbit/sec. Especially at the price you get them. :)</p>
<p dir="auto">I have some older HP thin clients and they're low powered and compact but that's it. :(</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/711218</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/711218</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[P3R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 21:15:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:54:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/delorean">@<bdi>DeLorean</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Assign manually your ports.<br />
The first LAN port of your Quad adapter, is em0 or em3<br />
Try first em0 for your LAN and skip opt1 and opt2.<br />
Then connect your LAN cable to the 1st LAN port, if you don't get connection,<br />
plug the cable in the 4st LAN port.<br />
If you then get a IP, and can login to the web UI, your good.<br />
If you then want the LAN port be on the otherside , you must choose em3 for your LAN.<br />
On some types of the Intel Pro/1000 the closest LAN port to the PCI-Express connector is em0, and sometimes it's em3.</p>
<p dir="auto">Grtz<br />
DeLorean</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Sorry for the late update. It works!! Thank you very much! You are absolutely correct. Turned out em0 is the furthest away from PCI-E connector rather than closest and now I can assign all interfaces to the appropriate devices in the lab.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/soyokaze">@<bdi>Soyokaze</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">/offtopic Ah, at last some one tried that. I had a bunch of t610 plus at some time, but never had time to experiment with pfSense on them.</p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe you have problems with link negotiation, or just with shitgrade cables - try forcing link speed/duplex manually.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">So it's been two days of running and it's just purr-ing along greatly! Apparently there is another T620 Plus being decommissioned in the office and I'm planning to grab before someone else does! Now I just need to play around with the firewall rules in each port to adjust each device accordingly. On a side note, I was surprised not many uses HP thin clients here. Is it because it's expensive and rather hard to get?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/711191</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/711191</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gurnsee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:54:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:00:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">/offtopic Ah, at last some one tried that. I had a bunch of t610 plus at some time, but never had time to experiment with pfSense on them.</p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe you have problems with link negotiation, or just with shitgrade cables - try forcing link speed/duplex manually.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/710647</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/710647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Soyokaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:00:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:07:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks! Let me give it a shot after I get home.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/710633</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/710633</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gurnsee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:07:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to HP T620 Plus Thin Client with Intel Pro&#x2F;1000 PT Quad Issue on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:56:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Assign manually your ports.<br />
The first LAN port of your Quad adapter, is em0 or em3<br />
Try first em0 for your LAN and skip opt1 and opt2.<br />
Then connect your LAN cable to the 1st LAN port, if you don't get connection,<br />
plug the cable in the 4st LAN port.<br />
If you then get a IP, and can login to the web UI, your good.<br />
If you then want the LAN port be on the otherside , you must choose em3 for your LAN.<br />
On some types of the Intel Pro/1000 the closest LAN port to the PCI-Express connector is em0, and sometimes it's em3.</p>
<p dir="auto">Grtz<br />
DeLorean</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/710506</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/710506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeLorean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:56:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>