<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Banana pi r2]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">See there are now banana pi images for freebsd 11</p>
<p dir="auto">The r2 would be a good fit hw wise if I can get it to work</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/128359/banana-pi-r2</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:20:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/128359.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:03:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Banana pi r2 on Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:10:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The b-pi image has been available for FreeBSD since late 2016, IIRC.</p>
<p dir="auto">For pfSense, we already have SG-1000, which is armv6, like b-pi.</p>
<p dir="auto">We’ve announced that we’re doing espresso.bin, which is arm64, and therefore much faster than banana-pi.</p>
<p dir="auto">https://espressobin.net/forums/topic/pfsense/page/2/</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/756016</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/756016</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jwt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:10:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>