Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    VALID NAT POOL

    NAT
    3
    4
    224
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      turk182 last edited by

      Hi,

      Can you use the network address and broadcast address of your public IP Bloc as part of the NAT Pool ?

      example given the public subnet xx.xxx.196.0 /30

      can you use the following as the Address Pool for NAT ?

      xx.xxx.196.0 ( network )
      xx.xxx.196.1
      xx.xxx.196.2
      xx.xxx.196.3 ( broadcast )

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JKnott
        JKnott last edited by

        Try it and see what happens.  However, I don't think you want to do that, even if it is possible.  Those addresses are not supposed to be assigned to devices.  Why would you even want to?
        BTW, I just took a look and those addresses are excluded from the available range.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimp
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate last edited by

          It entirely depends on the context.

          If you use that subnet on an interface directly, then no, those cannot be used.

          If your ISP has routed a subnet to you and you do not have it defined on an interface nor have any CARP or alias VIPs defined, you can use the entire subnet including the network and broadcast addresses for NAT.

          So for example:

          This will NOT work using the network or broadcast:

          x.x.x.0/30 - network
          x.x.x.1 - ISP
          x.x.x.2 - You
          x.x.x.3 - Broadcast

          This will work:

          The above on WAN, plus y.y.y.0/30 routed to x.x.x.2, then set y.y.y.0/30 as an outbound NAT subnet

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            turk182 last edited by

            Thanks for the responses!

            Will be trying out the following as suggested by jimp:

            The above on WAN, plus y.y.y.0/30 routed to x.x.x.2, then set y.y.y.0/30 as an outbound NAT subnet"

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post

            Products

            • Platform Overview
            • TNSR
            • pfSense Plus
            • Appliances

            Services

            • Training
            • Professional Services

            Support

            • Subscription Plans
            • Contact Support
            • Product Lifecycle
            • Documentation

            News

            • Media Coverage
            • Press
            • Events

            Resources

            • Blog
            • FAQ
            • Find a Partner
            • Resource Library
            • Security Information

            Company

            • About Us
            • Careers
            • Partners
            • Contact Us
            • Legal
            Our Mission

            We provide leading-edge network security at a fair price - regardless of organizational size or network sophistication. We believe that an open-source security model offers disruptive pricing along with the agility required to quickly address emerging threats.

            Subscribe to our Newsletter

            Product information, software announcements, and special offers. See our newsletter archive to sign up for future newsletters and to read past announcements.

            © 2021 Rubicon Communications, LLC | Privacy Policy