<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[New install VERY slow speeds]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am new to Pf, so if this is in the wrong area or if my questions are noobie excuse me. But I have a 200/200 connection from the isp, regular router works just fine. I have PF installed on a machine now and I only get 150 down, and 10up! I have been at it for hours, reinstalled and factory reset a number of times. The download I could live with, but 10 up? Thats terrible. Hardware should not be the bottleneck, the machine has an i5 and 4 gigs of ram. The wan comes in the built in nic, and lan comes out a usb nic.The machine in question is an ibm thinkcentre M91p</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/130253/new-install-very-slow-speeds</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 05:30:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/130253.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 02:59:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New install VERY slow speeds on Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:12:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yeah if both sides say full-duplex that should not be an issue.</p>
<p dir="auto">What happens is the full-duplex side transmits and the half-duplex side logs an error because it can't receive while transmitting. You end up with very low throughput in one direction - from the full- to the half-duplex port. The other way generally works fine because the full-duplex side can always receive without issue. It's possible to drop ACKs but in general it appears to be a one-way problem.</p>
<p dir="auto">This is generally only an issue when one side is hard-set and the other side is set to autonegotiate.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/763057</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/763057</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derelict]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:12:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New install VERY slow speeds on Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:05:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thank you for the reply. I considered that to be the issue as well, I was just unsure do to the download almost being full speed. Also, it is a mini case, so only room for one more nic. I had considered the built in one as being the issue as well. I'll replace one of the usb ones in the morning and see if anything changes. Everything says full-duplex so that would eliminate that cause right?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/763056</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/763056</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gtapro151]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:05:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to New install VERY slow speeds on Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:33:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">USB NIC should do better than that but, in general, they suck.</p>
<p dir="auto">I would start by looking for an ethernet duplex mismatch or something.</p>
<p dir="auto">Get real NICs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/763052</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/763052</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derelict]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:33:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>