<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Policy routing with NAT.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am running OpenVPN and using NordVPN and it works very well.<br />
Working at home now if you can believe that and due to some performance issues, I need to configure an IP address to go around the VPN.</p>
<p dir="auto">I am wanting traffic to or from IP 192.168.0.50 to route out the Wan port rather than through the VPN.</p>
<p dir="auto">I set up policy routing as configured below. I've struggled with this in the past and know that I have to configure NAT to direct inbound traffic back to IP 192.168.0.50.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1584729099677-2187aaa9-6eb6-4d26-b50d-6fd969053b3c-image.png" alt="2187aaa9-6eb6-4d26-b50d-6fd969053b3c-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">I have configured NAT outbound as shown here but without much success.<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1584729682769-c39b4510-f623-4e80-8676-5196a7d0bf94-image.png" alt="c39b4510-f623-4e80-8676-5196a7d0bf94-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Am I missing something simple here? Any guidance is appreciated.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/151504/policy-routing-with-nat</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:44:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/151504.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:47:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Policy routing with NAT. on Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:21:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ok.. Got it.<br />
I was assigning DNS entries from my PFSense box which was using NordVPN DNS servers.<br />
I plugged in my ISP DNS entries and voila'... All is good now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/898227</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/898227</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bakerjw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:21:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Policy routing with NAT. on Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:22:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I want all traffic through the VPN with the exception of what I allow through to my ISP.</p>
<p dir="auto">Setting up 192.168.0.90 as a policy route with a NAT configured allows a computer to connect to everything that it needs.</p>
<p dir="auto">With a smart device...<br />
If I configure 192.168.0.91 as a policy route and NAT configured the same way and try to connect to VUDU, it times out.<br />
If I put 192.168.0.91 at the bottom of the policy route and bottom of the NAT and try to connect to VUDU, I get the good ole 1:200 error synonymous with VPN usage.</p>
<p dir="auto">It's like Vudu is starting up a new connection back through and it is not making it to the originating IP address. That's why I'm wondering if I did the NAT correctly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/898214</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/898214</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bakerjw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:22:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Policy routing with NAT. on Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:58:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bakerjw">@<bdi>bakerjw</bdi></a> I would do it the other way around. Everything out to WAN, selected to VPN.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/898212</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/898212</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob.Dig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:58:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>