<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[IPv6 transit network]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was just looking at my tunnel addresses and noticed there are 2 transit networks, 1 link local /64 and 1 with a /64 address I configured in the <strong>IPv6 Tunnel Network</strong> box.  Are both necessary?  Shouldn't the link local be sufficient?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/151951/ipv6-transit-network</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 06:20:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/151951.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:47:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to IPv6 transit network on Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:11:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jknott">@<bdi>JKnott</bdi></a></p>
<p dir="auto">To clarify, the 2 ends need addresses, but it's not necessary to have 2 /64 networks to connect them.  For example, my cable modem has a /64 link local network, but a /128 host address.  So, a link local network and a /128 address or just a /64 specified address network could be used.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/901175</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/901175</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[JKnott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:11:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>