<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[More delay = better PCoIP?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ok so I have something I stumbled upon and want to know if it makes sense,</p>
<p dir="auto">I created a limiter to test a slow WAN with 28ms more delay than I have, from 1gbit/20ms to 26mbit/48ms</p>
<p dir="auto">Now I was very suprised by the performance as it was actually very useable through HP Z remote boost, framerate was shockingly stable, yes high compression of course but totally workable at 3440x1440</p>
<p dir="auto">Now I an wondering if the added delay acts like a buffer that throws flattens packageloss and jitter? Does that make sense?</p>
<p dir="auto">I want to run another test tomorrow with just the delay and no bandwith limiter and see if thats actually true or if I  am full of BS .</p>
<p dir="auto">for anyone that doesnt know pcoip is remote desktop/VDI software and I am using it to work from home in media and entertainment industry, (we make the CGI effects for movies basically).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/155107/more-delay-better-pcoip</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:28:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/155107.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:33:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to More delay = better PCoIP? on Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:33:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/finnschi">@<bdi>finnschi</bdi></a> - I'm not sure 48ms is enough added latency to see adverse effects.  If you bump that up to 150-200ms I think it will start to become more noticeable.  Also, regarding bandwidth - modern remote desktop/screen sharing programs are pretty efficient these days and don't need a significant amount of bandwidth.  What did your additional testing reveal?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/924544</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/924544</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tman222]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:33:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>