<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[prioritize ack packet for better downstream]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was reading the netgate documentation about pfsense.  It speaks about the downstream being affected if pfsense cannot acknowdlge the ack packet fast enough and this slows down the downstream  I have a really bad upstream, so if I  have some uploads going my download scrawls.  I know there was a wizard configuration when settings this up where it helped to prioritize browser or just port 80 basically.</p>
<p dir="auto">IF there something in traffic shaping that can tell pfsense to prioritize ack packet response in effort to increase my downstream?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/160801/prioritize-ack-packet-for-better-downstream</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:20:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/160801.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:54:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to prioritize ack packet for better downstream on Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:18:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The traffic shaper wizard should do that by default for you. https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/trafficshaper/index.html  If that's all you want you can basically ignore the other options (e.g. VoIP or P2P).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/963412</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/963412</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveITS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:18:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>