<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interface names]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The seemingly random application of interface names is a bit confusing.</p>
<p dir="auto">Given all of the issues, over many years, about interface naming, isn't there a simple/elegant solution in renaming all interfaces during install or when an if is added.<br />
It seems that renaming igb0 or em3 to the name you want to see, would be preferable to adding a new layer of names AND having the base names still appearing.</p>
<p dir="auto">Can we not add facility for "interface igb0 name lan" "interface em2 name ATT" etc..?<br />
Make selections on first boot, and expose those in the web interface? Is this even possible?</p>
<p dir="auto">Why create another layer of names, when what you really want is an if name that has meaning, rather than a ~random device dependent moniker?</p>
<p dir="auto">A lot of situations, over a long period of time, have been impacted by this naming kerfuffle.</p>
<p dir="auto">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/112991/interface-names<br />
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/45718/interface-names<br />
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/84068/migration-to-new-device-interface-names<br />
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/147419/changing-network-interface-names<br />
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/76653/how-to-get-interface-port-names</p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone have any thoughts on how to make this better?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/161027/interface-names</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 03:26:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/161027.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:12:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>