<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">First of all, thank you for making it possible to post my question here.<br />
I am new and desperate because I stuck my head into this issue a while now and it is not getting any clearer.</p>
<p dir="auto">Here is my problem:</p>
<p dir="auto">We use a pfSense as a client-VPN entry-point for our business.<br />
This pfSense is hosted on a cloud-server and connects with our WAN via IPsec to one of our sites. For our clients, we use OpenVPN via 443/UDP.</p>
<p dir="auto">As we do not have any other services in the same cloud, we only need one NIC, which is configured with a private IP given to us via DHCP from the cloud-hoster. We also have a public-IP which is forwarded to us.</p>
<p dir="auto">The firewall is configured completely open regarding IPsec and OVPN, as we are handling restriction on the site-firewall, not the pfSense.</p>
<p dir="auto">This did work for some time now, flawlessly even. However, we had to change the public-IP of the Site the IPsec-tunnel is connected to and therefore needed to change the IPsec-settings as well. The tunnel came back up without issues, but soon our OVPN-clients started to complain about certain programs not running. Upon further inspection, we noticed that only TCP services did not work, because they were missing half of their packets, constantly.</p>
<p dir="auto">After checking the firewall, we noticed that it was blocking said packets, even though they were fitting the requirements and were actually parts of a ongoing session. I have no idea what's going on.</p>
<p dir="auto">I did scetch a short picture to make things clearer:<br />
//cannot post due to it being marked as spam...</p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe some of you have a clue where to look?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you,</p>
<p dir="auto">Max</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/163232/single-nic-setup-blocks-tcp-traffic-besides-any-rule</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:19:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/163232.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:48:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule on Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:52:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Also, this should not be possible, right?</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1619711315131-b59dd3a3-ac9d-4c42-89f7-6bf3dbd29f62-image.png" alt="b59dd3a3-ac9d-4c42-89f7-6bf3dbd29f62-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">172.17.1.27 is a Server on the IPsec-Side, not an OVPN-client.<br />
Why did this appear as src on the ovpns1 Interface...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980510</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/980510</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxTheITGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule on Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:59:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/viragomann">@<bdi>viragomann</bdi></a></p>
<p dir="auto">Sorry, this was indeed maybe a bit too precautious.<br />
I just dislike showing IP patterns, sorry about that.</p>
<p dir="auto">The ports are actually all over the place and quite interesting.<br />
Some of the dst ports in those logs are dynamic ports from ongoing connections.<br />
Hence my idea about it being about asymetrical routing and splitted sessions.<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1619706796710-d06dbd91-c327-43d9-9dac-316698f660c6-image.png" alt="d06dbd91-c327-43d9-9dac-316698f660c6-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /><br />
As a test, I created a floating any-rule and set the state type to "none".<br />
After that, all those deny-entries changed to accept, but the issue still persists for the clients.</p>
<p dir="auto">About your other questions:</p>
<p dir="auto">All 172.19.X.X Clients are OVPN-Users connecting to the pfSense to access any other part of the network (Those other parts are the networks 172.17.X.X/172.18.X.X)<br />
There is no server or anything else in the cloud for the user to access, just this pfSense.</p>
<p dir="auto">Which services do the VPN clients access?</p>
<ul>
<li>Everything from HTTPS, SMB to RDP or DNS. UDP does currently work, TCP does not.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Is the access routed to the site?</p>
<ul>
<li>All internal traffic is routed to the site and from there to its destination.</li>
<li>External Web-traffic is not handled by the OVPN.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Are the connections natted?</p>
<ul>
<li>There is no NAT used internally. But the IPsec is built on the Port forwarding of the Cloud-Hoster.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">If there is anything else I should paste in here, please tell me.<br />
Do you need a copy of "Diagnostics/Routes" for further understanding?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for your help!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980505</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/980505</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxTheITGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:59:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule on Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:55:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/maxtheitguy">@<bdi>maxtheitguy</bdi></a><br />
Why do you hide private IPs (+ ports!)? No one here will be able to access them in any way.</p>
<p dir="auto">Without any clue of your network, IPSec and OpenVPN setup and the routing table of pfSense it's hard to say, what's going wrong.</p>
<p dir="auto">Which services do the VPN clients access?<br />
Is the access routed to the site? Are the connections natted?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980362</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/980362</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[viragomann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:55:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule on Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Just as a further thought:</p>
<p dir="auto">I think this might have something to do with asymetric routing, because a lot of posts with similar errors go in the same direction. But I am wondering how, as this setup shouldn't be able to loop in any way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980303</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/980303</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxTheITGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Single NIC setup blocks TCP traffic besides ANY rule on Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:52:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/maxtheitguy">@<bdi>maxtheitguy</bdi></a><br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1619193173461-my-issue.jpg" alt="My issue.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/979559</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/979559</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaxTheITGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:52:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>