<![CDATA[Public library with all historical pfsense versions?]]>It has happened before in history that a release is flawed like 2.5.1 and lacks fundamental capabilities like multi wan nat.

Wouldnt it be great if there was a site available that has any released versions available for DL so people quickly could return to a working config??

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/163408/public-library-with-all-historical-pfsense-versionsRSS for NodeSun, 12 Apr 2026 20:13:09 GMTFri, 30 Apr 2021 08:11:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 07 May 2021 22:31:14 GMT]]>@jknott lol I think my fingers were buffer overflowing my brain.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/981974https://forum.netgate.com/post/981974Fri, 07 May 2021 22:31:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 07 May 2021 18:10:16 GMT]]>@akegec said in Public library with all historical pfsense versions?:

@stephenw10 maybe just maybe he has not broken don't fix netality.

It appears your spell checker is broken. 😉

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/981936https://forum.netgate.com/post/981936Fri, 07 May 2021 18:10:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 07 May 2021 18:06:38 GMT]]>Only 'not broken' if you don't check the list of known exploits against that ancient unsupported FreeBSD base version I would suggest 😉

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/981935https://forum.netgate.com/post/981935Fri, 07 May 2021 18:06:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 07 May 2021 07:11:14 GMT]]>@stephenw10 maybe just maybe he has not broken don't fix netality.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/981835https://forum.netgate.com/post/981835Fri, 07 May 2021 07:11:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Sat, 01 May 2021 14:14:18 GMT]]>That's a huge step! Could be any number of reasons you saw a drop in performance.

But no-one should be running a 2.2.x image at this point. The list of known issues there must be very long by now.

Steve

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980831https://forum.netgate.com/post/980831Sat, 01 May 2021 14:14:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:11:45 GMT]]>@akegec I just shifted to 2.5.0 from 2.2.6.......

And tbh I liked the 2.2.6 better. Much better throughput performance...

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980665https://forum.netgate.com/post/980665Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:11:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:59:54 GMT]]>That's not a bad idea. But then again company needs to push their new hardware or people will land on the street. Some of techgeeks are still using pfsense version 2.4.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980664https://forum.netgate.com/post/980664Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:59:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:24:17 GMT]]>@nogbadthebad I know.

:) But thats not the issue here ;)

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980631https://forum.netgate.com/post/980631Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:24:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Public library with all historical pfsense versions? on Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:14:42 GMT]]>@cool_corona said in Public library with all historical pfsense versions?:

has happened before in history that a rele

Keep backup copies.

The issue will be with updating the packages.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/980628https://forum.netgate.com/post/980628Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:14:42 GMT