<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels</p>
<p dir="auto">meaning;<br />
3 wan interfaces<br />
1 - real wan<br />
2 - ovpn1 / wg1<br />
3 - ovpn2 / wg2</p>
<p dir="auto">load balance all traffic between 2 and 3</p>
<p dir="auto">I looked at this doc, but I believe this refers to multi-way for more of a physical WAN connections vs VPN connections;</p>
<p dir="auto">https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/multiwan/policy-route.html</p>
<p dir="auto">Thankyou</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/163839/does-pfsense-support-multi-wan-routing-across-2-or-more-openvpn-or-wireguard-tunnels</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 11:03:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/163839.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 16:59:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels on Tue, 01 Jun 2021 21:49:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/townsenk64">@<bdi>townsenk64</bdi></a> Thankyou really appreciate all the insight</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/985795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/985795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[network-stack-445]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 21:49:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels on Fri, 21 May 2021 15:48:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/network-stack-445">@<bdi>network-stack-445</bdi></a> Well, It's more of a load distribution than a true balance, If all four tunnel gateways are set at the same priority level in the gateway group it will rotate through them. tunnels can be excluded from this rotation based on the tunnel connection being down, high latency and or packet loss.<br />
please keep in mind that the Advanced setting "Sticky Connections"  has an effect on this as well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/984128</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/984128</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[townsenk64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 15:48:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels on Thu, 20 May 2021 18:42:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/townsenk64">@<bdi>townsenk64</bdi></a><br />
Thankyou I appreciate the insight, so with 4OVPN tunnels, the WAN access is load balanced ok?</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a 1G Internet, tried to get the most out of it</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/984009</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/984009</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[network-stack-445]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 18:42:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does pfSense support multi-wan routing across, 2 or more OpenVPN or Wireguard tunnels on Wed, 19 May 2021 14:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/network-stack-445">@<bdi>network-stack-445</bdi></a> If your talking about openVPN clients connected to a VPN provider and utilizing the VPN connections in a load balance/failover capacity. Then yes, ( I currently do this with 4 tunnels) However, this only works for me with 2.5 and older. it seems that with 2.51 &amp; above the more tunnels you have results in VPN gateway packet loss Some will connect and some simply stay disconnected with 100% packet loss.  As a result I'm still on 2.4.5p1 which works with no problems. I'm not sure If this is an OpenVPN issue or how or when it will be fixed. Wireguard on the other hand was removed in 2.5.1 due to kernel security issues and is currently being developed as a package for versions 2.6 line. I do not know what issues still exist but I did have the configuration running with 2.5 before it's removal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/983867</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/983867</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[townsenk64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 14:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>