<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hey Everyone,</p>
<p dir="auto">Our pfSense installation has gotten severely out of date. I've recently been tasked with leading a migration to new hardware as well as the latest version of pfSense.</p>
<p dir="auto">Last weekend my boss and I attempted to restore the current firewall config to the new hardware. We were able to restore the config successfully, communicating to local devices. However, we were unable to get a connection to the internet. We can still ping our ISPs router so this makes me believe it's a BGP issue.  What reinforces that thought is that openBGPD is no longer available after 2.4.x.</p>
<p dir="auto">On both routers, everything except for the BGP is the same. Same switchport config, same public IP, VLANs, settings, etc...</p>
<p dir="auto">I guess what I'm really looking for here is validation in my thinking that no BGP router is our problem.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/168501/openbgpd-and-ffr-migrating-2-3-x-to-latest-2-5-x</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:57:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/168501.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:46:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:18:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/work_purposes_only">@<bdi>work_purposes_only</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/1014758">openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nollipfsense">@<bdi>nollipfsense</bdi></a> I've just inherited this network. So, I'll be taking this next year to tidy it up before going back to uni for my degree</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Okay...fine inheritance...hope it came loaded (your forum name implied business).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014765</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[NollipfSense]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 21:18:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:34:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nollipfsense">@<bdi>nollipfsense</bdi></a> I've just inherited this network. So, I'll be taking this next year to tidy it up before going back to uni for my degree</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[work_purposes_only]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:34:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:58:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yeah if the upstream router requires you announce your subnet you won't get much without BGP!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014749</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014749</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:58:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:56:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/work_purposes_only">@<bdi>work_purposes_only</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/1014708">openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Our pfSense installation has gotten severely out of date.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">At least, you admitted...but man, if your setup is for a business, it makes one shaking, scratching one's head for not taking the business network seriously.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014748</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014748</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[NollipfSense]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:56:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:56:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/stephenw10">@<bdi>stephenw10</bdi></a> Thanks for the response! I think I may have figured it out. Our uplink is configured so we <strong>need</strong> to use a BGP router. Otherwise, we'll need to phone the isp to enable static BGP routing for us. I think my boss now understands we need to use bgp</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014747</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014747</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[work_purposes_only]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:56:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to openBGPD and FFR - Migrating 2.3.x to Latest 2.5.x on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:19:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You are probably hitting the changed FRR requirement to have a route-map in place:<br />
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/packages/frr/bgp/example.html#route-map-for-peer-filtering</p>
<p dir="auto">Without that you will see not routes exchanges in the current version.</p>
<p dir="auto">Need more info to speculate further.</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014721</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1014721</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:19:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>