<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">I have an SG-5100 as my gateway. The rule on WAN is the default, which is block all incoming (plus the block private and bogon).</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a mix of devices on the LAN, mostly windows but also one Linux server (<em>it's an internal staging server - doesn't need to accept traffic from outside</em>) and I recently configured a Linux desktop (<em>for some testing needs</em>).</p>
<p dir="auto">This new desktop is Ubuntu 22.04. After installation, I enabled ufw on it with fairly restrictive rules (<em>block all incoming and outgoing traffic, except for specific combinations</em>).</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Issue</strong><br />
Within a few hours of installation, I noticed a bunch of entries in the Ubuntu firewall log that I wasn't expecting. The most problematic ones seem like incoming requests from external IPs. Examples below</p>
<pre><code>Jul 23 23:12:05 ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 2290.328780] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eno1 OUT= MAC=74:46:a0:a8:88:8b:00:90:0b:8c:d9:4b:08:00 SRC=142.250.65.206 DST=192.168.1.35 LEN=66 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x80 TTL=61 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=443 DPT=45631 LEN=46
Jul 24 00:11:19 ubuntu-desktop kernel: [ 5844.376046] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eno1 OUT= MAC=74:46:a0:a8:88:8b:00:90:0b:8c:d9:4b:08:00 SRC=169.197.150.7 DST=192.168.1.35 LEN=91 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=58 ID=48987 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=443 DPT=57286 WINDOW=11 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0
Jul 24 01:22:35 ubuntu-desktop kernel: [10120.424253] [UFW BLOCK] IN=eno1 OUT= MAC=74:46:a0:a8:88:8b:00:90:0b:8c:d9:4b:08:00 SRC=38.91.45.7 DST=192.168.1.35 LEN=91 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=58 ID=48558 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=443 DPT=34766 WINDOW=11 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto"><strong>My question</strong><br />
How did these requests get past pfSense in the first place?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/173725/bad-configuration-uneducated-user-or-a-compromised-firewall</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:35:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/173725.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 20:44:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall? on Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:27:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thank you <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/viragomann">@<bdi>viragomann</bdi></a>, I did not know that !</p>
<p dir="auto">For the benefit of future readers who may not have the time to read the wikipedia article. It looks like the QUIC protocol (<em>which runs on top of UDP</em>), might some day replace the TCP protocol. If you're configuring a firewall, you want to allow outgoing TCP <strong>and</strong> UDP traffic to 443.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054019</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054019</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrPhil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:27:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall? on Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:10:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drphil">@<bdi>drphil</bdi></a><br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054011</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054011</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[viragomann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:10:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall? on Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:08:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Actually I think I know the answer. Once I installed Ubuntu, a few minutes passed before I enabled UFW. The desktop must have sent out the TCP and UDP requests in those few minutes.</p>
<p dir="auto">Which is the other annoying aspect. The machine has been attempting outbound requests to 1e100.net (<em>which I understand is Google</em>), deepintent.com (<em>no idea who they are and why is my machine trying to reach them</em>) and some IPs that don't return anything with rDNS.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054010</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054010</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrPhil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:08:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall? on Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:02:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/viragomann">@<bdi>viragomann</bdi></a> Thank you that makes sense and makes me feel much better.</p>
<p dir="auto">In my mind it completely explains at least two of these entries (TCP). Could I ask for your opinion on the UDP one also? The UFW firewall actually blocks outgoing 443 on UDP (<em>only allows TCP</em>).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054004</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054004</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrPhil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:02:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad configuration, uneducated user or a compromised firewall? on Wed, 27 Jul 2022 20:56:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drphil">@<bdi>drphil</bdi></a><br />
Source port 443? No device uses 443 as source port.<br />
So I assume, these are servers, which the machine has requested before. Hence pfSense opened the port, but the Ubuntu firewall might already have closed the connection at this time, while pfSense didn't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054002</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1054002</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[viragomann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 20:56:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>