<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[VRRP tracking]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">How do i submit a feature request to have VRRP track the route instead of an interface?<br />
Its not uncommon to have an uplink L3 nexthop not be directly connected so even if the interface goes down the nexthop is still accessible. Tracking route gives another way to influence VRRP master/router selection.<br />
Juniper and Cisco offer this feature.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/184396/vrrp-tracking</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 01:25:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/184396.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:24:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to VRRP tracking on Tue, 28 Nov 2023 01:58:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/michmoor">@<bdi>michmoor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/1138664">VRRP tracking</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">How do i submit a feature request to have VRRP track the route instead of an interface?<br />
Its not uncommon to have an uplink L3 nexthop not be directly connected so even if the interface goes down the nexthop is still accessible. Tracking route gives another way to influence VRRP master/router selection.<br />
Juniper and Cisco offer this feature.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">A feature request (#12423) has been opened on Netgate's internal tracker for this.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1138755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1138755</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derelict]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 01:58:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>