<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Aggregate bandwidth with dual WAN??]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I tried to search, but no results.<br />
Is it possible (I know it is possible, but not sure about with pfsense) to sort of bond two internet connections to achieve aggregate bandwidth?</p>
<p dir="auto">I did this years ago with a piece of software and 2 cable HSD connections, but I don't remember what the software was and can't seem to find it again.<br />
Anyway I would rather do it via something like pfsense rather than a windows box running for just that purpose…not too stable in comparison.</p>
<p dir="auto">What I am more concerned about was the harder thing to do as I remember ... I want more upload bandwidth.</p>
<p dir="auto">My wife may soon have the chance to work from home. Which is great...except that she needs to upload video files all day long to her company's servers through a VPN. So I am doubting that multiple connections for the same file will work well for her. She would need the opposite of a download manager.  Does this exist?<br />
I am not as worried about the downloading of them as most HSD connections where we are are fast enough for that, but I wouldn't complain if that worked as well.</p>
<p dir="auto">So if anyone knows a way to do this or has some recommendations of dual wan routers that have the aggregate bandwidth capability...please let me know.</p>
<p dir="auto">Any info to help me out here is appreciated.</p>
<p dir="auto">thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/1853/aggregate-bandwidth-with-dual-wan</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:29:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/1853.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:10:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>