<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One last step to finish my network setup (or am I terribly mistaken)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello all,</p>
<p dir="auto">I have read about pfSense, but never had the chance to try it until a few days ago. Now that I've moved to a new house and had some storage room where the ISP router is located as well, I wanted to give it a try.</p>
<p dir="auto">I tried to draw my situation / setup and would like to get your comments on how to finalize it and prevent any pitfalls I maybe unaware of.</p>
<p dir="auto">Storage Room:</p>
<ul>
<li>ISP's router</li>
<li>an old PC with Proxmox loaded and installed a few VMs on it, one of them being pfSense.</li>
<li>QNAP NAS</li>
<li>A managed switch NetGear GS308E</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">There are two CAT6 Cables going from the storage room to the living room</p>
<p dir="auto">Living room:</p>
<ul>
<li>both cables are in a corner</li>
<li>my wired pc in the same corner</li>
<li>a TPLink powerline (TL-PA8010P)</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">on the other side of the room</p>
<ul>
<li>another TPLink powerline (TL-WPA8631P) which I also use as the main WiFi AP</li>
<li>some devices wired to TPlinks LAN ports</li>
<li>some wifi devices connected to TP link</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">What I want to achieve is this;<br />
set up two different configurations on GS308E, so that if anything happens to the Proxmox/pfSense setup, I can route all the internal traffic through port 1 of the switch<br />
or route all traffic through route two of the switch<br />
but I should always be able to reach the NetGear what ever the connection happens to be.</p>
<p dir="auto">Do you think this will work, are there any problems with this approach?<br />
should pfSense's WAN port be also on managed switch (instead of the router) and be part of the configuration so that it's access is not lost</p>
<p dir="auto">any and all constructive feedback is most welcome.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/185561/one-last-step-to-finish-my-network-setup-or-am-i-terribly-mistaken</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:06:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/185561.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:09:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One last step to finish my network setup (or am I terribly mistaken) on Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:11:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">it didn't allow the picture in the first post, so here goes...<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1705352147175-48d57e1a-949e-49fc-92f2-1d7f96893a06-image.png" alt="48d57e1a-949e-49fc-92f2-1d7f96893a06-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1148003</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1148003</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bahadur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:11:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>