<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[High Availability II]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Greetings</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm new to OpenBSD &amp; pfSense and I'm currently looking into a pfSense cluster setup exactly as described in Fig.2 http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1014.0.html.<br />
In order to avoid having the switch as single point of failure I would like to connect each pfSense to a separate switch (which is interconnected with its own trunking feature).</p>
<p dir="auto">I have come across the trunk(4) feature in OpenBSD which means I can setup two NICs as a virtual NIC and let them act as an active/standby pair (I guess the failure criteria is the media link up/down).</p>
<p dir="auto">My question is would the CARP feature work on top of such a virtual NIC (setup IP, MAC….)?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for any hints,<br />
hp</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/1880/high-availability-ii</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:15:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/1880.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:53:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to High Availability II on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:45:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hpommer">@<bdi>hpommer</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Greetings</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm new to OpenBSD &amp; pfSense and I'm currently looking into a pfSense cluster setup exactly as described in Fig.2 http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,1014.0.html.<br />
In order to avoid having the switch as single point of failure I would like to connect each pfSense to a separate switch (which is interconnected with its own trunking feature).</p>
<p dir="auto">I have come across the trunk(4) feature in OpenBSD which means I can setup two NICs as a virtual NIC and let them act as an active/standby pair (I guess the failure criteria is the media link up/down).</p>
<p dir="auto">My question is would the CARP feature work on top of such a virtual NIC (setup IP, MAC….)?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for any hints,<br />
hp</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">FWIW, we don't run on OpenBSD.  So, no this feature won't work and I dunno if it'd work as you describe in Open.</p>
<p dir="auto">–Bill</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/141358</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/141358</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[billm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:45:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to High Availability II on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:41:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">CARP will work on VLANs if that is what you mean.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/140301</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/140301</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:41:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>