<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[iperf3 issue over IPsec (VTI mode)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am experiencing an issue where I can only run iperf from B (client) to A (server) not A (client) to B (server). I found a <a href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/159456/iperf3-issue-for-ipsec-vti-between-two-sites">similar issue here</a> with the difference the user complaints of a low bitrate whereas mine is inexistent.</p>
<p dir="auto">From B to A:</p>
<pre><code>Connecting to host 10.254.0.1, port 5201
[  5] local 10.254.0.2 port 33407 connected to 10.254.0.1 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.12   sec  12.6 MBytes  94.8 Mbits/sec    0   1.60 MBytes       
[  5]   1.12-2.01   sec  14.9 MBytes   139 Mbits/sec    0   2.00 MBytes       
[  5]   2.01-3.02   sec  16.1 MBytes   135 Mbits/sec    1   1.09 MBytes       
[  5]   3.02-4.01   sec  16.0 MBytes   135 Mbits/sec    0   1.19 MBytes       
[  5]   4.01-5.01   sec  16.5 MBytes   139 Mbits/sec    0   1.26 MBytes       
[  5]   5.01-6.02   sec  15.9 MBytes   132 Mbits/sec    0   1.32 MBytes       
[  5]   6.02-7.01   sec  16.5 MBytes   140 Mbits/sec    0   1.35 MBytes       
[  5]   7.01-8.02   sec  16.5 MBytes   137 Mbits/sec    0   1.38 MBytes       
[  5]   8.02-9.01   sec  16.2 MBytes   138 Mbits/sec    0   1.39 MBytes       
[  5]   9.01-10.01  sec  17.1 MBytes   143 Mbits/sec    0   1.40 MBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.01  sec   158 MBytes   133 Mbits/sec    1             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.06  sec   158 MBytes   132 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">However, on the other way around, from A (client) to B (server):</p>
<pre><code>Connecting to host 10.254.0.2, port 5201
[  5] local 10.254.0.1 port 1618 connected to 10.254.0.2 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    2   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    2   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    1   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   3.00-4.01   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   4.01-5.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    1   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   6.00-7.03   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   7.03-8.00   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   8.00-9.01   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    0   1.32 KBytes       
[  5]   9.01-10.00  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    1   1.32 KBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec    7             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.05  sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">Firewall rules are identical on both sides, allowing ipv4 all protocols. Traffic on all accounts works exactly as supposed both ways over the tunnel. From A (client) to B (server) is the test I need on iperf. Any ideas?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/190629/iperf3-issue-over-ipsec-vti-mode</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:03:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/190629.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:46:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to iperf3 issue over IPsec (VTI mode) on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:17:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gblenn">@<bdi>Gblenn</bdi></a> Actually site B has minimal services, no suricate, snort pfblocker or anything else installed.<br />
I'm clueless.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[maverickws]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:17:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to iperf3 issue over IPsec (VTI mode) on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:25:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/maverickws">@<bdi>maverickws</bdi></a> Yepp, it is that set of patches that I applied which resolved the issue for me. But now that I checked my thread on the issue I had, it was slightly different. I had timeout in one direction and very low (kbit range) in the other.<br />
<a href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/190089/i-can-ping-both-directions-but-only-access-servers-one-way">https://forum.netgate.com/topic/190089/i-can-ping-both-directions-but-only-access-servers-one-way</a></p>
<p dir="auto">Could it be that you have something else blocking on site B? Like Suricata perhaps?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189459</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189459</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gblenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:25:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to iperf3 issue over IPsec (VTI mode) on Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:19:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gblenn">@<bdi>Gblenn</bdi></a> thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p dir="auto">So on the B side I have a development snapshot of 24.08.<br />
Side A has 24.03 with all patches installed. Double checked and the mentioned fixes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Fix IPsec VTI static routes not being added after boot (After applying, edit and save affected IPsec tunnels or reboot., Redmine #15449)</li>
<li>Automatically use floating states for IPsec rules (After applying, reload the filter or reboot., Redmine #15430)</li>
<li>Automatically use floating states on IPsec VTI (After applying, reload the filter or reboot., Redmine #15606)</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Are applied. I also believe these are already merged in the 24.08 snapshot</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[maverickws]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:19:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to iperf3 issue over IPsec (VTI mode) on Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:01:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/maverickws">@<bdi>maverickws</bdi></a> I was having a similar issue recently and the solution was to apply the patches related to IPSec (Redmine #15449, 154430 and 15606).<br />
Which pfsense version are you on?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189337</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1189337</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gblenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:01:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>