Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Routing traffic without involving the firewall and/or interfaces !! :)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved L2/Switching/VLANs
    1 Posts 1 Posters 70 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      louis2
      last edited by louis2

      Two problems here perhaps / probably related:

      1. Traffic arriving from my provider, which have to pass without FW involvement

      2. VLANS which are related to two physical interfaces (can be laggs)

      Issue-1) Traffic which should pass pfSense without FW involvement

      My provider offers two data streams Internet and TV via two VLAN's arriving via a trunk coming from the providers (in home) fiber switch.

      At this moment I split those two streams in a switch in front of pfSense and only route the internet steam to pfSense.

      I would like to split those streams inside the pfSense computer, creating a firewall interface for the internet stream and routing the TV-stream directly towards an interface (trunk, bridge, lagg)

      I do not know how to accomplish this, without routing the TV-stream through the firewall what I do not like.

      Issue-2) Firewall interfaces needed to create a bridge !! ๐Ÿ˜ง ๐Ÿ˜ง

      I have some low trafic vlans needed in multiple interfaces leaving pfSense. And I do not want to solve that via inter switch connections. So I did create some vlan related bridges on pfSense.

      That works not issue, but the way to define the bridges is ....... weird ...

      Lets say I need vlan-x in interface-A and in interface-B. What I would expect is that I define a bridge by combining A.x and B.x ...... however not so .......

      I first have to

      • define a firewall interface for A.x and one for B.x
        which I can than combine to a bridge
      • than I can create a bridge based on those two interfaces
      • than I can use the created bridge as source of a third interface C
      • and use that interface in favor of the firewall
        ( not using interfaces A and B)

      That works but it is .... weird .... and I have now two completely nonsense interfaces in the interface list. To be short .... I do not like it ๐Ÿ˜Š

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.