<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Policy based routing via two IPSEC gateways.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Trying to figure out what I am missing in the following setup.</p>
<p dir="auto">Dual IPSEC VTI tunnels that work with static route pointing at one of the gateways.<br />
I am trying to implement failover and looked into policy based routing where I add both IPSEC gateways to a Gateway Group and create a firewall rule to target those gateways.</p>
<p dir="auto">I create pertinent rules under network tabs but it does not work. What else needs to be done?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/197967/policy-based-routing-via-two-ipsec-gateways</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:09:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/197967.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:14:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Policy based routing via two IPSEC gateways. on Sat, 28 Jun 2025 23:55:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Resolved by implementing BGP peering over IPSEC.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/1219156</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/1219156</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dersini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 23:55:39 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>