Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    6100 Firmware 03.00.00.03t-uc-126

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    13 Posts 2 Posters 4.0k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • luckman212L Offline
      luckman212 LAYER 8
      last edited by luckman212

      Updated my 6100 to 25.07 RC today, and just clicking around I noticed a new Firmware seems to have been installed: 03.00.00.03t-uc-126

      Is this expected? I note the "latest" version appears to be an older build (uc-18):

      9c993231-4a70-4ec2-8b8b-5ce7f45a522c-image.png

      Also, on my Dashboard, it shows BIOS CORDOBA-03.00.00.03t - with a date of 2023-03-17 - do these BIOS and Firmware versions align?

      75cb5041-2a24-404c-98b8-af592470071f-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S Online
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Hmm, nope. 18 is the latest microcontroller code version.

        [25.07-RC] [admin@6100.stevew.lan]/root: ls -ls /usr/local/share/pfSense-pkg-Netgate_Firmware_Upgrade/roms/
        total 10695
         817 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 Nov 12  2024 ADI_DFF2-01.00.00.17-nodebug.rom
        3257 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel 16777216 Nov 12  2024 ADI_PLCC-01.00.00.20.bin
        1073 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel 16777216 Nov 12  2024 ADI_RCC-01.00.00.18-nodebug-16m.rom
         817 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 Nov 12  2024 ADI_RCCVE-01.00.00.17-nodebug.rom
        2361 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 Nov 12  2024 CORDOBA-03.00.00.01-2Ct-uc-15.fd
        2373 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 Nov 12  2024 CORDOBA-03.00.00.03t-uc-18.fd
        
        [25.07-RC][admin@6100.stevew.lan]/root: sysctl dev.cordbuc.0.version
        dev.cordbuc.0.version: 18
        

        Try a full power cycle if you haven't already.

        luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • luckman212L Offline
          luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
          last edited by

          Thanks Steve, the full power cycle / cold boot got things sorted:

          949c0768-53c3-413a-857a-77c568f0d619-image.png

          👍

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S Online
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Nice. Weird though. 😕

            luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • luckman212L Offline
              luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Updated to 25.11.a.20250916.0600 yesterday and noticed this came up again (little different this time, now it says 03.00.00.03t-uc-254)

              7743f324-0f54-44c6-9c1b-ce4aa0212e6b-image.png

              c694a0f2-2452-4e26-b775-75f8f0893182-image.png

              6eb80116-d5df-4f3b-83cf-a4e5539d4fff-screen 0.png

              Cold boot fixed it again. Strange.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S Online
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Hmm, if you see it again check the version reported in the sysctl:

                [25.07.1-RELEASE][admin@6100.stevew.lan]/root: sysctl dev.cordbuc.0.version
                dev.cordbuc.0.version: 18
                
                luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • luckman212L Offline
                  luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 Yeah, damn, I had that in my notes from the last time, but I forgot. I'll try to remember next time!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stephenw10S Online
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    It pretty much has to be reporting incorrectly there since that's what the gui uses but it would be good to confirm.

                    luckman212L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • luckman212L Offline
                      luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                      last edited by luckman212

                      @stephenw10 fast forward a bit! just had this happen again on a different 6100 after an upgrade from 25.07 → 26.03.1. Haven't rebooted yet in case there are any other commands you want me to run. Things seem to be working fine.

                      fcd5679c-5ed8-4d3f-ab2a-4aaa18e783e7-CleanShot 2026-05-29 at 08.45.33.png

                      c66d1896-5e46-4e54-be67-f67ca9dbd3ec-CleanShot 2026-05-29 at 08.46.55.png

                      from the console:

                      # sysctl dev.cordbuc.0.version
                      dev.cordbuc.0.version: 190
                      
                      # ls -ls /usr/local/share/pfSense-pkg-Netgate_Firmware_Upgrade/roms/
                      total 10695
                       817 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 May 15 19:08 ADI_DFF2-01.00.00.17-nodebug.rom
                      3257 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel 16777216 May 15 19:08 ADI_PLCC-01.00.00.20.bin
                      1073 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel 16777216 May 15 19:08 ADI_RCC-01.00.00.18-nodebug-16m.rom
                       817 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 May 15 19:08 ADI_RCCVE-01.00.00.17-nodebug.rom
                      2361 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 May 15 19:08 CORDOBA-03.00.00.01-2Ct-uc-15.fd
                      2373 -rw-r--r--  1 root wheel  8388608 May 15 19:08 CORDOBA-03.00.00.03t-uc-18.fd
                      
                      # sysctl -a | grep -Ei 'cordob|cordb'
                      Netgate Cordoba GPIO Driver 0.4 loaded
                      cordbuc0: <Netgate Cordoba IO controller> at port 0x800 on isa0
                      gpio0: <Cordoba uC GPIO controller> on cordbuc0
                      dev.gpio.0.%parent: cordbuc0
                      dev.gpio.0.%desc: Cordoba uC GPIO controller
                      dev.cordbuc.0.version: 190
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%iommu:
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%parent: isa0
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%pnpinfo:
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%location:
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%driver: cordbuc
                      dev.cordbuc.0.%desc: Netgate Cordoba IO controller
                      dev.cordbuc.%parent:
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S Online
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, well that confirms the driver is reporting incorrectly.

                        If you reboot without power cycling does it still show that?

                        If you then power cycle does it show the expected value?

                        luckman212L 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • luckman212L Offline
                          luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 thanks I will check tonight when everyone goes home

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • luckman212L Offline
                            luckman212 LAYER 8 @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 update: after warm reboot, still reporting 03.00.00.03t-uc-190

                            I'm not onsite to do a cold reboot, but will ask them to do it on Monday. I assume that will clear whatever this strange condition is.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S Online
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm, interesting. That implies it's actually the microcontroller reporting that value to the driver. 🤔

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.