Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Missing tags in the repo

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    7 Posts 4 Posters 426 Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O Offline
      ohmantics
      last edited by

      Trying to research some perf issues on one of my boxes and I think they may be fixed by 3008f30d2c2cabdd7e17f7fb922139da8681ffbd. I see that commit is in the FreeBSD-src repo on GitHub, but I see no tags that I can correlate to pfSense release branches, so I can't quite tell if that commit is in the 25.11 builds or not.

      patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • patient0P Online
        patient0 @ohmantics
        last edited by

        @ohmantics said in Missing tags in the repo:

        3008f30d2

        I guess it would help readers if you mention what the commit is about : "vtnet: improve checksum offloading"

        You can check redmine.pfsense.org if there's an issue open for the topic you're interested in.

        There is a thread about the new PPPoE kernel module and the vtnet driver where is offloading mentioned:

        https://forum.netgate.com/topic/199313/pfsense-vm-on-proxmox-pppoe-only-works-when-parent-nic-is-pci-passthrough-virtual-nic-breaks-lan-wan-traffic

        But to cut a long story short, only a Netgate employee will be able to answer that since the GH repo hasn't gotten any new branches after 2.7.2.

        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O Offline
          ohmantics @patient0
          last edited by

          @patient0 I was looking at that change because I'm using vtnet (Proxmox) and as I'm not on PPPoE, I am not experiencing any connectivity problems, but I am having throughput issues. I should be getting some number of Gbit and instead have peaked at 500-ish MBit for iperf3 from the Proxmox shell to the pfSense guest.

          I originally chose virtual NICs to make it easier to reconfigure without invalidating the NDI calculation. Before I go randomly trying 25.11 builds or switching to E1000 and other virtual NICs, I thought I'd check if the issue was already resolved.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            SteveITS Rebel Alliance @ohmantics
            last edited by

            @ohmantics Did you https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/virtualize-proxmox-ve.html#disable-hardware-checksums-with-proxmox-ve-virtio ?

            Also general advice is to try to avoid running bandwidth tests on pfSense, but through pfSense to something else, otherwise the extra CPU usage on pfSense may affect the test.

            Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
            When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, CPU, and/or disk speed.
            Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O Offline
              ohmantics @SteveITS
              last edited by

              @SteveITS said in Missing tags in the repo:

              @ohmantics Did you https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/virtualize-proxmox-ve.html#disable-hardware-checksums-with-proxmox-ve-virtio ?

              Yes. That got me from 450Mbit to 500Mbit.

              Also general advice is to try to avoid running bandwidth tests on pfSense, but through pfSense to something else, otherwise the extra CPU usage on pfSense may affect the test.

              I cited this example to show that the issue was self-contained to pfSense/Proxmox. Even when just passing the traffic through, one CPU in pfSense pegs at 100%.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S Offline
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                @ohmantics said in Missing tags in the repo:

                3008f30d2c2cabdd7e17f7fb922139da8681ffbd

                That is in 25.11 builds.

                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O Offline
                  ohmantics @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 said in Missing tags in the repo:

                  @ohmantics said in Missing tags in the repo:

                  3008f30d2c2cabdd7e17f7fb922139da8681ffbd

                  That is in 25.11 builds.

                  Thanks!

                  I think my next step is to change off of vtnet to some other virtual NIC type and try to keep the same MACs.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.