Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    Is the FreeBSD Remote Code Execution Vulnerability fixed in 26.03?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    6 Posts 4 Posters 756 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U Offline
      uniqueusername
      last edited by

      Hi,

      My understanding is that Claude Mythos found the following RCE in FreeBSD:

      https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:08.rpcsec_gss.asc

      The release of pfsense 26.03 seems to be in time to pick up the fix in FreeBSD, but my searches and checks do not turn up the magic link to tell me definitely that it is fixed in the current stable branch.

      Can someone confirm we have the fix and moving forward make it a bit more obvious in the release notes which version of FreeBSD we have. This table entry and link is undecipherable: 16.0-CURRENT@c215eef34550. If someone can decode it, that might help.

      Anything to clearly communicate the state of security in the firewall would be appreciated. RCE's in the days of AI exploits is unnerving to say the least.

      Thanks for all your efforts!

      Regards,

      Neil

      johnpozJ patient0P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Online
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @uniqueusername
        last edited by

        @uniqueusername said in Is the FreeBSD Remote Code Execution Vulnerability fixed in 26.03?:

        https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:08.rpcsec_gss.asc

        Kernels that do not have kgssapi.ko loaded are not vulnerable.

        If I look on my 26.03

        [26.03-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.home.arpa]/root: kldstat
        Id Refs Address                Size Name
         1   36 0xffffffff80200000  31ef360 kernel
         2    1 0xffffffff833f1000   629670 zfs.ko
         3    1 0xffffffff83a1b000    1e320 opensolaris.ko
         4    1 0xffffffff84220000     5b60 udf.ko
         5    1 0xffffffff84226000     23a0 cpuctl.ko
         6    1 0xffffffff84229000     4250 ichsmb.ko
         7    1 0xffffffff8422e000     2178 smbus.ko
         8    1 0xffffffff84231000     a290 aesni.ko
         9    1 0xffffffff8423c000     4b18 cryptodev.ko
        11    1 0xffffffff84271000     20f0 coretemp.ko
        12    1 0xffffffff84274000     4d10 ichwd.ko
        13    1 0xffffffff84241000    2f5e0 if_wg.ko
        [26.03-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.home.arpa]/root: 
        

        that doesn't seem to be loaded.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 26.03.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 26.03.1

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S Online
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          It's not a module we ship as available to load either.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • patient0P Offline
            patient0 @uniqueusername
            last edited by

            @uniqueusername said in Is the FreeBSD Remote Code Execution Vulnerability fixed in 26.03?:

            This table entry and link is undecipherable: 16.0-CURRENT@c215eef34550. If someone can decode it, that might help.

            I'd say the versioning is reasonable. pfSense is running on FreeBSD 16-CURRENT, source code git commit c215eef34550, maybe with patches applied.

            pfSense is on running on CURRENT for a while, 'What is the FreeBSD-CURRENT concept?'.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • U Offline
              uniqueusername
              last edited by

              Thank you all for the responses! I always like learning something.

              For us slightly less technical folks that use pfsense, its a high bar to hurdle to determine that on our own.

              Can one rely on the fact that you will always tell us when a vulnerability has been addressed and leave it at that?

              Silence means nothing to see here?

              We're weeks away from a vulnerability disclosure tidal wave...

              Thanks again,

              Neil

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S Online
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Generally. yes, we review FreeBSD CVEs and assess whether or not they apply to pfSense. A lot (most? 🤔 ) do not apply since pfSense is a very cut down subset of the FreeBSD code.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy