Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    7100 : spoof MAC ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    18 Posts 2 Posters 3.5k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S Offline
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      The spoofed MAC definitely shows up for me. The upstream router shows it in its ARP table or a pcap.

      The LAGG and VLAN shouldn't make any difference. None of that layer 2 stuff exists beyond the switch.

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        sgw @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10

        You talk of the internal switch?
        There is no switch between the 7100 and the fiber-appliance.

        Thanks for clarifying. It was just a wild guess while I was listing the possible differences between plugging in the 2 7100-appliances.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S Offline
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yes the internal switch. The upstream devices shouldn't see any of the LAGG or VLAN specific packets.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            sgw @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 thank you. Even more of a mystery.
            I am curious what the upstream support replies.
            I don't expect much ...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S Offline
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Really the only significant difference would be the overhead the tagging adds meaning the path MTU might be slightly lower. But that would be identical between the two 7100s. And it wouldn't prevent connecting entirely.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                sgw @stephenw10
                last edited by sgw

                I have a theory ... we might test that on friday or tuesday.

                Maybe on appliance 2 the assigned order of the interfaces got mixed up?

                I am not 100% sure if that is possible, the config.xml was restored so that should be identical.

                What I think of: the local admin plugs the cable for WAN2 into ETH2 on App1 and things work (I just make up an example).

                So we'd assume ETH2 on Appliance2 should also be assigned to WAN2 (and use its configured static IP etc). The admin just plugs the cable FROM App1:ETH2 TO App2:ETH2 ...

                If that's not the case and for some reason WAN2 points to ETH3 on Appliance2 (because of whatever ... timings at bootup?) this would result in the logged behavior: ETH2 plugged in would show the spoofed MAC, but no configured IP.

                The theory maybe lacks a bit .. but could that be the case?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S Offline
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  What might be happening is the switch config is different. That doesn't get synced so it's possible you have the VLAN assigned to a different port on the secondary node. It's unlikely though if you restored a config onto the secondary from the primary when creating it.
                  But it's easy enough to compare the switch config on each node.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    sgw @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    Yes, the internal switch config on Appliance was missing the configs for the additional WAN-interfaces.

                    The MAC-spoofing might not be needed at all, a test with a random laptop came online on that upstream fiber gateway without problems (with some random MAC).

                    Now with the correct VLANs etc on the internal switch the plugging works perfectly (we can plug between the 2 appliances and connectivity is up immediately).

                    thanks!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • stephenw10S Offline
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Nice. Good result! 👍

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        sgw @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 said in 7100 : spoof MAC ?:

                        Nice. Good result! 👍

                        It's an honor to hear this from you, thanks ;-)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.