Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    Introducing Netgate Nexus: Multi-Instance Management at Your Fingertips.

    pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.16_1?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    15 Posts 9 Posters 3.7k Views 12 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R Offline
      rpotter28 @fireodo
      last edited by

      @fireodo I too noticed that, and I too have not been able to find any info on it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        pfsjap
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 Can you provide information about this update?

        GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GertjanG Online
          Gertjan @pfsjap
          last edited by

          @pfsjap said in pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.16_1?:

          Can you provide information about this update?

          For those who can't wait :
          Copy the folders (directories) used by pfblockerng, for example this one :

          2a3e339c-9e78-4eab-beb6-4f08a3a7d2ad-image.png

          to /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng-copy

          Now run the upgrade.
          Then, run the diff command on these two folders, and you'll have the result 😊

          A dot or underscore release, imho, a very minor modification, it wouldn't be a new functionality or something like that.

          No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • P Offline
            pfsjap @Gertjan
            last edited by

            @Gertjan Sure, why not. After all, the procedure you described using diff is the standard and common practice in the industry to find out what and why was something released.

            GertjanG johnpozJ 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GertjanG Online
              Gertjan @pfsjap
              last edited by

              @pfsjap said in pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.16_1?:

              why not

              I should have added that pfSense doesn't have a button that proposes 'get the previous version of that package back' if, for some reason, the newest version wasn't the greatest.
              pfSense Plus user have ZFS which is next best.

              No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ Offline
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @pfsjap
                last edited by

                @pfsjap bit of sarcasm detected - heheh ;)

                @BBcan177 is the guy who would know - I looked at few resource sites he lists, and seems he is a bit behind in updates to these sites.. Its quite possible the only change is the one listed commit in the github from a few months ago, and it just now has been released as package??

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 26.03.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 26.03.1

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GertjanG Online
                  Gertjan @pfsjap
                  last edited by

                  @pfsjap said in pfBlockerNG-devel 3.2.16_1?:

                  why not

                  I should have added that pfSense doesn't have a button that proposes 'get the previous version of that package back' if, for some reason, the newest version wasn't the greatest.
                  That said, pfSense Plus user have ZFS which is next best as it has snapshots.

                  No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    tagit446
                    last edited by

                    I'm not try to hijack this post but how is it that some people are being offered a devel update of 3.2.16_1 when just a few days ago I was offered update 3.2.14_2 ?

                    After completing the update to 3.2.14_2, I'm not being offered anything newer. This makes me wonder if maybe there is something wrong with my install.

                    If it matters, I am using pfSense CE 2.8.1-RELEASE (amd64).

                    SteveITSS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • SteveITSS Offline
                      SteveITS Rebel Alliance @tagit446
                      last edited by

                      @tagit446 Plus is later than CE so has later version packages.

                      To upgrade, select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings. When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, CPU, and/or disk speed.
                      Only install packages for your version of pfSense.
                      Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • T Offline
                        tagit446 @SteveITS
                        last edited by

                        @SteveITS Okay thanks, I was wondering if being on CE had something to do with it.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          tman222
                          last edited by

                          Looked around a bit more and came across this issue on Redmine:

                          https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16932

                          Could this be the fix that led to the 3.2.16_1 release? Thanks again.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Online
                            Mission-Ghost @tman222
                            last edited by

                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2026 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                            Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy