<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What do you use for algorithm?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have a 20mb/5mb connection.  Until recently, I was using the default HFSC, but all I really care about is 256kb or so for outbound VOIP.  I ended up changing to PRIQ, so there are 3 queues: voip at 7, ack at 6 and default at 3.  Is there any real reason to use one versus the other with such a simple set of requirements?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/23334/what-do-you-use-for-algorithm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 19:35:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/23334.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:00:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What do you use for algorithm? on Wed, 05 May 2010 23:05:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I believe the main difference is that PRIQ will reorder packets so that the higher priority ones are passed first, and can't control bandwidth used in the way that HSFC can.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you really want to reserve that bandwidth for VoIP, you may have better luck with HFSC. (but I may be wrong here, someone who knows the altq innards better than I do would probably know for certain)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/231798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/231798</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:05:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>