<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Syslog vs Growl?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have used Syslog before for the router to communicate with the main terminal and I have recently discovered Growl. Can anyone explain to me the differences of what pfSense would communicate through Syslog vs. Growl.</p>
<p dir="auto">Additionally, how would I be able to test if Growl is receiving information from pfSense, is there a command line I could send through pfSense to Growl so I know if it is working or not?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/24799/syslog-vs-growl</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:54:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/24799.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:51:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Syslog vs Growl? on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:21:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Growl, and the other notification types like smtp, only notify for major errors or events.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you want to test it, go to Diagnostics &gt; Command and enter:</p>
<p dir="auto">file_notice("test", "Test notification");</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/238765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/238765</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:21:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>