<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[WiFi Direct]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Direct" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">WiFi Direct</a> is now loose in the wild.  Atheros has one card on the list of the first officially certified products, so I suspect pfSense could prove valuable in managing the perimeter.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/27515/wifi-direct</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:07:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/27515.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:12:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to WiFi Direct on Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:19:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was hoping there would be some sort of flag that would allow indicate traffic that used the WFD method and therefore allow construction of a designated ruleset for WFD traffic.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/251874</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/251874</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mhotel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to WiFi Direct on Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:24:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It doesn't actually sound like it needs any special hardware.  Unless I'm mistaken, from the description it sounds like it should be possible with any hardware that supports access point mode.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/250884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/250884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Efonnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:24:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>