<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Kernel polling]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe this is a stupid question, but why isn't there device/kernel polling in pfsense.<br />
I am currently running m0n0wall on my WRAP, but would like to use pfsense.<br />
Only running on pfsense i get a big cpu-load, and running m0n0wall with the polling option enabled the load is almost none.</p>
<p dir="auto">why is this?</p>
<p dir="auto">Greetz,<br />
Huntermic</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/286/kernel-polling</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 08:14:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/286.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:38:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kernel polling on Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:32:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It does work, however, kernelpolling has a lot of timings that should be tweaked to the appropriate platform/cpu performance. m0n0 aims at slow hardware and has an image for each platform which makes it possible to supply different sets for different hardware. As  pfsense has only a general image supplying different optimizations is not that easy (unless we add some kind of pulldown menu with different optimizations or even a tweak page). This is something we already have discussed and even  tested different settings with a wrap (see http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=Tuning ) and might appear in a version after 1.0.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/132819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/132819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:32:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kernel polling on Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:00:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, I'm running pfsense at the moment, found the polling option, but it seems is doesn't help on my WRAP.<br />
With m0nowall it made i big improvement, but with pfsense i don't see any diff.<br />
How can i check if it does work or not?</p>
<p dir="auto">Greetz,<br />
Michiel</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/132818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/132818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[huntermic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:00:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kernel polling on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:19:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">ow, ok, i didn't know it was available in pfsense at the moment. Last time i used pfsense it wasn't there.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/132602</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/132602</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[huntermic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:19:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kernel polling on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:43:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Check system&gt;advanced in the webgui. You find Polling at the "miscelaneous" section.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/132601</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/132601</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:43:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>