<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why not Alias in captive portal?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi, why we can not use alias in the captive portal rules like in the firewall. This can be usefull for allowed ips and hosts.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/32114/why-not-alias-in-captive-portal</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:48:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/32114.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:43:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why not Alias in captive portal? on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:00:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Aliases are strictly in pf, captive portal is in ipfw.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/272554</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/272554</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:00:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why not Alias in captive portal? on Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:28:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Well, for example in my case i have a vpn in a box with captive portal, if i need to monitor the access points from outside i need to put a ip allowed rule for all ips.</p>
<p dir="auto">But ok, i thought that was because the system of the firewall and captive portal differs</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/272528</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/272528</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[danesco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:28:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why not Alias in captive portal? on Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:03:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Because nobody has seen the need for it and noone has pushed it, yet.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/272526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/272526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eri--]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:03:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>