<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Captive portal while in transparent mode]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Can pfSense now be used as a captive portal while in transparent mode?  I was reading an old post from around 2008 stating that pfSense cannot be configured in such a way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/34973/captive-portal-while-in-transparent-mode</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:48:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/34973.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:02:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:24:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Please do not hijack threads or you will get administrative provisions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/298314</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/298314</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eri--]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:24:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:43:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/alltime">@<bdi>alltime</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Can pfSense now be used as a captive portal while in transparent mode?  I was reading an old post from around 2008 stating that pfSense cannot be configured in such a way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">No! Captive Portal does not work in transparent mode (layer2 bridge), you have to setup pfsense as a gateway &amp; use pfsense DNS forwarding for Captive Portal to work.</p>
<p dir="auto">~ Dave ~</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/298246</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/298246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[daveg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:43:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:53:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It is unrelated to your pfSense installation being a transparent bridge or not.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/286675</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/286675</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eri--]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:53:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:13:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@ermal:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">You would want server2 on an allowed ip in the CP settings.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Ermal,</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for your suggestion.  Would we implement what you mentioned after configuring the server as a transparent bridge?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/286498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/286498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[alltime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:13:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:36:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You would want server2 on an allowed ip in the CP settings.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/286462</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/286462</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eri--]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:36:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:37:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">My use of transparent mode is to achieve the following:</p>
<pre><code>
Server1 - 192.168.3.5
|
|Cisco Firewall
|
|VPN (Internet)
|
|Cisco Firewall
|
pfSense WAN - 192.168.3.1
pfSense LAN - 192.168.1.1
|
|
Server2 - 192.168.1.5

</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">Until we put pfSense in place, Server1 was always able to access Server2 due to the VPN.  Now, since pfSense is in place, Server1 has no knowledge of Server2.  I would like pfSense to disappear on the network and allow us to go back to the "old days."  But I still would like to use the Captive portal.</p>
<p dir="auto">Is this possible?  and am I defining transparent mode properly?  I am attempting to follow these rules: http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/286147</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/286147</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[alltime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:37:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Captive portal while in transparent mode on Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:00:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">If transparent mode is a bridge or http proxy with transparent mode, the answer is yes.<br />
If it is something else please state to get the answer.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/285806</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/285806</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[eri--]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:00:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>