<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[IPSEC] NAT&#x2F;NAT-T]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, im setting up an IPSEC VPN between a pfSense and a Cisco 1841, the thing is between this two there is a Router that is NATing the pfSense trafic. What i did is redirecting port 500 to the pfSnese but im still having some problems. Do i need to set NAT-T ??</p>
<p dir="auto">My Set UP is:<br />
Phase 1 3DES,SHA1, pre-shared-key<br />
Phase 2 ESP-3DES, SHA1</p>
<p dir="auto">Well thats all, thx</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/36297/ipsec-nat-nat-t</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 20:29:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/36297.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 04:17:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [IPSEC] NAT&#x2F;NAT-T on Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:29:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">NAT-T would be the way to go there, if you can. Otherwise you're almost guaranteed some kind of breakage.</p>
<p dir="auto">Note you also need to forward back the entire ESP protocol, not just udp/500 (and udp/4500 for NAT-T)</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/292116</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/292116</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:29:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>