<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Remote exploit?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello is this remote exploit http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&amp;id=1703 vulnerable for pfSense cause its using openbsd pf? Thanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/3801/remote-exploit</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:13:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/3801.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:58:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Remote exploit? on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:28:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">We do not do IPV6.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/151199</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/151199</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sullrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:28:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Remote exploit? on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:05:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not sure as this is a problem for ipv6 only and we don't offer ipv6 yet. So unless you allow ipv6 in (it's in the firewall protocol list) you are save. This is the recommended workaround to handle this issue until the update anyway.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/151190</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/151190</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoba]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:05:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>