<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi all,</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a multi-wan setup on an older Dell PowerEdge 2650 Server.  Currently, the server has 3 NICs.  1 LAN, 1 WAN to a 40M Fiber connection, and 1 WAN to a 10M DSL connection for failover.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm building a new Dell PowerEdge R410 server that has 2 internal Gigabit NICs.  I'm wondering if it would be better to purchase an additional PCI-E NIC for the 2nd WAN connection or if I would be just as well to create VLANs for the 2 WAN connections?</p>
<p dir="auto">Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks,</p>
<p dir="auto">jeff</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39607/multi-wan-add-nic-or-use-vlans</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 05:41:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39607.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:40:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs? on Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:17:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I would go with vlans and not bother with another NIC.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/307148</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/307148</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[clarknova]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:17:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs? on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:18:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I think this should work and perform well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/306713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/306713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nachtfalke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:18:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs? on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:38:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks Nachtfalke,</p>
<p dir="auto">I should have mentioned that we already have a good HP VLAN capable switch that I can use.  Regarding the bandwidth, I figured I would be OK since the sum of the 2 WANs is 50M (I wouldn't be using the DSL either except for failover events).  The built-in broadcom NICs are gigabit.  Even though I will be plugging it into a 100M port on the HP Switch, I still have headroom for bandwidth.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thoughts?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/306706</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/306706</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[the.it.dude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:38:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs? on Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">if you are using VLANs und WAN site than you need a VLAN capable switch to which you can connect your ISP's modems.</p>
<p dir="auto">MODEM1–-untagged VID10----<br />
                                          ---switch----tagged VID10+20 ---- pfsense------LAN<br />
MODEM2---untagged VID20----/</p>
<p dir="auto">If I think about the costs it would be perhaps better to use a dual port or quad port NIC for "less" WAN connections and if you are using more than 4 WAN than it would be perhaps cheaper to use a VLAN capable switch and one NIC.</p>
<p dir="auto">But if you are using one NIC for many WANs than you should use a good intel server NIC to handle th sum of bandwidth of all you WANs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/306700</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/306700</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nachtfalke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:12:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>