<![CDATA[Game server + Routing questing.]]>I have no idea if this is possible or not. So I have to ask the more skilled people.

We have two game servers running on a fiber line. But not all our users have an acceptable latency to the servers, probably due to ISP peering. I was wondering if what I have written below is possible, and if it's possible how would I approach it?

Site 1:
On site one there is a pfSense 1.2.3 Firewall + 1 WAN address + 1 LAN interface. On the LAN interface there is two game servers where people can connect from the WAN interface to the servers. This works fine.

Site 2:
On site two there is a pfSense 2.0 Firewall + 1 WAN address. Is it possible to connect site two and one through a tunnel, so that the users can connect to site two and access the game servers on site one without any user interaction.

It has to be said that between site 1 and site 2 the latency is very low (2-5ms).

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/39739/game-server-routing-questingRSS for NodeSat, 10 Oct 2026 02:49:17 GMTTue, 06 Dec 2011 00:15:44 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Game server + Routing questing. on Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:10:54 GMT]]>Thanks, and personally I would use OpenVPN rather than ipsec (racoon).

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/307877https://forum.netgate.com/post/307877Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:10:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Game server + Routing questing. on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:56:33 GMT]]>I'll see if I can make it work show how =). Thanks!

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/307667https://forum.netgate.com/post/307667Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:56:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Game server + Routing questing. on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:12:16 GMT]]>You might be able to do a site-to-site VPN between the two and then do some routing magic when you NAT on site 2.

]]>https://forum.netgate.com/post/307641https://forum.netgate.com/post/307641Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:12:16 GMT