<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bad disk issue with FreeBSD 6.1 based builds]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm still using build 01-24-07 since my last bad experience with an upgrade, but i'm getting weird errors now with heavy disk activity as described here:</p>
<p dir="auto">http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103435</p>
<p dir="auto">These cause temporary disk deadlocks dropping one of my network interfaces and screwing its CARP virtual ip.</p>
<p dir="auto">In particular i was just looking at snort blocked addresses and all our network connections were dropped simultaneously (i had to relaunch pfsync to make it work correctly again, it was stuck in INIT), as by system logs:</p>
<p dir="auto"><em>re0: watchdog timeout<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=33122223<br />
re0: 10 link states coalesced<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
re0: link state changed to UP<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=33122223<br />
re0: 11 link states coalesced<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
re0: link state changed to UP<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
ad5: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly<br />
ad5: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=33122223<br />
re0: 11 link states coalesced<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
re0: link state changed to UP<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
re0: link state changed to UP<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
re0: watchdog timeout<br />
re0: link state changed to DOWN<br />
ad5: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=156301487<br />
re0: link state changed to UP<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 10.100.0.1 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.66 (!AF_LINK)<br />
arp_rtrequest: bad gateway 62.2.160.97 (!AF_LINK)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It seems that it's been solved with the 6.2 kernels from last november, so i'd like to know if the latest pfsense build is reliable for a production use and the "preemption" kernel config key is still disabled (see http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,3664.0.html).</p>
<p dir="auto">Regards!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/4107/bad-disk-issue-with-freebsd-6-1-based-builds</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 20:20:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/4107.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:49:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad disk issue with FreeBSD 6.1 based builds on Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:02:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">known bugs is why the snapshots are not yet a release version. The first 1.2 beta will be out soon, which will be free of all known issues. The 1.2 release should follow shortly after.</p>
<p dir="auto">As for IRQ sharing, yeah it shouldn't cause any problems, but it will reduce performance (not sure how much, but something as active as a disk and a NIC, both of which can be interrupt heavy if under load, could be significant).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/152981</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/152981</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:02:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad disk issue with FreeBSD 6.1 based builds on Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:14:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks for the support and here's the update.</p>
<p dir="auto">I've managed to update the BIOS, btw it's a Dell machine and there are no IRQ settings available. I found out that two of the installed network cards share the same IRQ, i hope that's not a big issue, i think it's a common practice.</p>
<p dir="auto">Anyway i've also installed the latest build and it worked flawlessly, i just had a bad duplication problem with the services list (multiple "squid" rows). I've conducted tests which previously failed (even if after a long uptime) on the file system and now they seem to work fine, but before too much complimenting i'd like to see what happens under heavy load, also heavy network load.</p>
<p dir="auto">Also, latest build seems to have the issue outlined here</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,3325.0.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,3325.0.html</a></p>
<p dir="auto">in the last post solved</p>
<p dir="auto">BTW, what stops you from releasing the latest builds?</p>
<p dir="auto">Alberto</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/152972</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/152972</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[k3rmit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:14:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad disk issue with FreeBSD 6.1 based builds on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:44:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">you can try a snapshot from http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/ for a 6.2-based version. No debugging is enabled.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/152841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/152841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:44:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bad disk issue with FreeBSD 6.1 based builds on Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:20:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Setup the BIOS so the nics are not sharing the Hard Disks IRQ.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/152802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/152802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sullrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:20:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>