<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">First question: see subject header</p>
<p dir="auto">Second question:  In regards to SIP and NAT does PFSense rewrite packets to have the external IP on it?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/43671/pfsense-support-sip-traffic-through-nat</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:39:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/43671.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:59:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT? on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:09:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/dhatz">@<bdi>dhatz</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">"symmetric NAT" (<a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_7-3/anatomy.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">more</a>) i.e. the most restrictive (and secure) type of NAT.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Wow, 100% pure information on that page. I just discovered I knew nothing.<br />
Thanks Dhatz.  :)</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/329201</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/329201</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:09:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT? on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:49:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">pfsense does not do any special handling of SIP traffic, i.e. by default it doesn't enable any "proxy" (aka ALG Application Level Gateway). SIP traffic is handled just like all other traffic. This is generally a good thing, because many SIP ALGs implemented in routers break things.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, since the pf (packet filter used by pfsense) implements the so-called "symmetric NAT" (<a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_7-3/anatomy.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">more</a>) i.e. the most restrictive (and secure) type of NAT, on average it leads to more headaches with non-NAT-aware protocols (like SIP) than if you were using a NAT firewall implementing a more permissive NAT algo.</p>
<p dir="auto">Developments of NAT traversal technologies (STUN, ICE etc) in recent years have made things much easier with SIP, so it boils down to the capabilities and configuration of both your SIP device and your VoIP provider, which is why there isn't really a single configuration that one could post here for every pfsense user to use.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/329187</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/329187</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dhatz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:49:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT? on Fri, 06 Apr 2012 05:12:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">first question: of course.</p>
<p dir="auto">second question:  by default, no, and generally that's bad (lots of the devices that do so break SIP in various ways), but if you're in a scenario where that's a must, siproxd does so.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/329163</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/329163</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 05:12:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PFSense support SIP Traffic Through NAT? on Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:19:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">|'ve not had cause to try it myself but I think this is what you're looking for:<br />
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Siproxd_package</p>
<p dir="auto">Steve</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/329066</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/329066</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[stephenw10]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:19:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>