<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[GRE and IPSec]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi Guys,</p>
<p dir="auto">I finially got the time to get my pfSense setup working. Currently, I have a Verizon Fios site linking to my colo over GRE and it work great with one exception. That is the lack of IPSEC encapulation for the GRE tunnel.</p>
<p dir="auto">I am using the GRE tunnel since the network at the colo is a bit complex with many networks. I dont want to have to change my SAs everytime we add a network. Every client has thier own networks (via vlans and vrfs) for production, managment, vpn access and other things.</p>
<p dir="auto">Does/are their plans for pfSense to support IPSEC with GRE?</p>
<p dir="auto">Scott</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/47648/gre-and-ipsec</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:39:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/47648.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:25:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GRE and IPSec on Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:48:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Someone provided a diff, but iirc it still has some rough edges<br />
Check https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/pull/118</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/351200</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/351200</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dhatz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:48:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>