<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can PFSense do this?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm pretty sure that it can, but here goes:</p>
<p dir="auto">-Two redundante PFSense firewalls.<br />
-Dual-WAN (so far so good right?)<br />
-Multiple VIP addresses per WAN<br />
-1:1 NAT of WAN VIPs back to IP addresses back behind the PFSense box.</p>
<p dir="auto">Can I assume that load-balanced WAN connections are also redundant?  What do y'all think, does all of this sound reasonable?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you!<br />
Schnibitz</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/4809/can-pfsense-do-this</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:47:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/4809.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:08:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can PFSense do this? on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:22:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Wow, that was fast, thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/156025</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/156025</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[schnibitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:22:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Can PFSense do this? on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:14:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yes.  Doing all of this now including failover DNS.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/156024</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/156024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[sullrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 04:14:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>