<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Vlan communication on em interfaces]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I tried updating to the last snapshot last night and lost connectivity across my vlans again. I have to fallback to an April 17 2012 snapshot in order to get my vlans working again. I have tried to update to the latest snapshot a number of times since April, but the results are always the same.</p>
<p dir="auto">Should I try a clean install of the latest snapshot or is there still a known issue with em interfaces and vlan communication? I have 2 em NICs that are on direct connected vlans with no tagging and they can't communicate with each other either.</p>
<p dir="auto">LAN (em0) can't talk to Opt1 or any other network connected to the pfsense<br />
Opt1 (em1) can't talk to LAN or any other network connected to the pfsense</p>
<p dir="auto">Communication works correctly on the April 17 2012 snapshot</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/topic/52898/vlan-communication-on-em-interfaces</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 20:31:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netgate.com/topic/52898.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:38:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Vlan communication on em interfaces on Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:08:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">After manually entering all of my settings from a backup configuration, I believe I found a more concrete answer than 'something in the upgrade path'. I have a multi-wan setup and do load balancing and prioritization across each link. Everything on the clean installed worked fine until I had loaded all of the rules in (which is where outbound gateways are defined). It seems that between the April 17 2012 snapshot that I was running and last weeks, something changed with how internal IPs and directly connected networks are routed when the default rule for an interface does load balancing. I believe the change occurred in a more narrow timeframe as I have had this issue on other snapshots I tried as well, prior to list week, including a Sept 2012 snapshot.</p>
<p dir="auto">I am not sure how many others have come across this issue, or if you always needed a rule per interface to handle internal/direct connected networks and the snapshot I was using had a bug that ignored that, but it would be good to know what changed in regards to that and why.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks all for reading about my troublesome weekend messing with pfSense snapshots.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/378319</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/378319</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[oggsct]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:08:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Vlan communication on em interfaces on Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:39:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I did a clean install and these issues are resolved. My only guess is the constant snapshot upgrade path broke something along the way.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/378042</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/378042</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[oggsct]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:39:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Vlan communication on em interfaces on Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:05:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You. Have two interfaces without vlan configured?</p>
<p dir="auto">Vlan Id x untagged on switch means no config on server's interface.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netgate.com/post/378019</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netgate.com/post/378019</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[marcelloc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:05:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>